Skip to main content

Consider a player who is in check. Suppose they can make a move that would putcheckmate the opponent in checkmate, but would not stop themselves from being in check. Would that be a legal move?

For example, in the position below, if Black plays ...Rf8Rf8, it will put the White king in checkmate, but the Black king will still be in check. Is this move legal?

[FEN "K7/8/2n5/1r6/8/8/3k3R/5r2 b - - 1 0"]
[StartFlipped "0"]

(To be clear, Note that this position is displayed from White’s point of view, even though it is Black’s move.)

Consider a player who is in check. Suppose they can make a move that would put the opponent in checkmate, but would not stop themselves from being in check. Would that be a legal move?

For example, in the position below, if Black plays ...Rf8, it will put the White king in checkmate, but the Black king will still be in check. Is this move legal?

[FEN "K7/8/2n5/1r6/8/8/3k3R/5r2 b - - 1 0"]
[StartFlipped "0"]

(To be clear, this position is displayed from White’s point of view, even though it is Black’s move.)

Consider a player who is in check. Suppose they can make a move that would checkmate the opponent, but would not stop themselves from being in check. Would that be a legal move?

For example, in the position below, if Black plays ...Rf8, it will put the White king in checkmate, but the Black king will still be in check. Is this move legal?

[FEN "K7/8/2n5/1r6/8/8/3k3R/5r2 b - - 1 0"]
[StartFlipped "0"]

Note that this position is displayed from White’s point of view, even though it is Black’s move.

If Can a player is in check win, but has a move that would put their opponent in checkmate without stoppingby checkmating the checkopponent, would that move be legalwhile not getting themselves out of check?

Use FEN viewer; use more consistent and gramatically-correct wording.
Source Link

If a player A is in check, but has a move which willthat would put their opponent in checkmate player B without exitingstopping the check, iswould that move be legal?

IfConsider a player who is in check, but. Suppose they can make a move that willwould put the opponent in checkmate, but it willwould not removestop themselves from being in Check, ischeck. Would that be a legal move?

For example, in the imageposition below, if blackBlack plays Rf8...Rf8, it will put the blackWhite king will still be in checkcheckmate, but the whiteBlack king will still be put in checkmatecheck. Is this move legal?

[FEN "K7/8/2n5/1r6/8/8/3k3R/5r2 b - - 1 0"]
[StartFlipped "0"]

Checkmate while still being in Check(To be clear, this position is displayed from White’s point of view, even though it is Black’s move.)

If player A is in check but has a move which will checkmate player B without exiting check, is that move legal?

If a player is in check, but can make a move that will put the opponent in checkmate, but it will not remove themselves from being in Check, is that a legal move?

For example, in the image below, if black plays Rf8, the black king will still be in check, but the white king will be put in checkmate. Is this move legal?

Checkmate while still being in Check

If a player is in check, but has a move that would put their opponent in checkmate without stopping the check, would that move be legal?

Consider a player who is in check. Suppose they can make a move that would put the opponent in checkmate, but would not stop themselves from being in check. Would that be a legal move?

For example, in the position below, if Black plays ...Rf8, it will put the White king in checkmate, but the Black king will still be in check. Is this move legal?

[FEN "K7/8/2n5/1r6/8/8/3k3R/5r2 b - - 1 0"]
[StartFlipped "0"]

(To be clear, this position is displayed from White’s point of view, even though it is Black’s move.)

Became Hot Network Question
Source Link
user32279
  • 245
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Loading