In short, the key idea is to prevent white from playing h2-h3
!
Bc4
forces the exchange of light square bishops, and thus, sets up Rh3
which blocks the h2
pawn and keeps both the h2
and g4
pawns weak.
Concretely, the only piece currently covering h3
is the light squared bishop on f1
, so by trading the bishop with Bc4
, which white cannot prevent as Bg2
leaves h2
hanging, white has no immediate means (e.g. a rook on g3
would prepare h3
but it's too slow) of preventing black's imminent Rh3
.
Black's bigger idea is to create two connected central passed pawns!
More precisely, the plan is:
- to pressure
g4
, and binding white's rooks to the defense of g4
and h2
,
- bring the king to
e6
to prepare the d5
advance to trade the e4
pawn, then go back to e6
and similarly prepare trading white's g4
pawn with f5
,
- after which black is left with a passed
f
and e
pawn, that is, two connected passed pawns!
Suppose Bc4
is not played, then white gets to play h3
, and thus maintaining their bind on light squares and killing black's prospect of
creating two connected passers.
In the game itself, Ivanchuck decided to trade the g
-pawn quickly (by advancing it to g5
) in order to get rid of one of his weak pawns, after which Anand still managed to execute his plan as all he had to ensure was trading the e4
pawn by playing d5
. Here's the position that transpired in the actual game, where Anand's plan has been executed to perfection:
Quite an exemplary game showing Anand's deep positional understanding: note the move Bc4
a priori undermines a couple of chess principles:
it willingly trades black's only good bishop, after which black is left with a hemmed-in dark squared bishop vs white's active one. Moreover, black allows
their queenside pawns to become shattered into 2 (isolated) islands, and in doing so having less chance of dominating1 2-vs-3
on the queenside.
In spite of all these at-first-glance-unfavourable aspects of the move, Anand beautifully realised controlling the h3
square outweighs them all, since preventing white's h2-h3
pawn advance to support g4
is the only way black can maintain the prospect of active play in the pawn skeleton that had transpired, as we discussed above.
1: Domination in this context means: the side with the minority (less pawns) achieving a setup (e.g. a blockade) where neither of the majority pawns of the opponent can (easily) advance. Typical to the Sicilian pawn structure on the queenside, one such setup could be white's pawns being on a2-b3-c2
and black's pawns pinning down on dark squares with a5-b4.
For an example see the setup by Caruana (as black) in his candidates game vs Karjakin (e.g. around move 22
), where indeed one of his positional mistakes in that game was to give up the domination with 26...a4.