Timeline for An unnecessary threat?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2016 at 23:24 | comment | added | Noam D. Elkies | If Rc1 then Ba3 (noted by CognisMantis) actually traps the Rook (Ra1 Bb2). Since you're going to lose the Exchange, you might as well continue with c4, but it seems a rather speculative sacrifice. | |
| Sep 11, 2016 at 11:04 | comment | added | Dag Oskar Madsen | Interesting position. I agree that long castle seems dubious. | |
| Sep 11, 2016 at 1:06 | answer | added | Tony Ennis | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 10, 2016 at 21:47 | comment | added | CognisMantis | c4 looks good. Also, Rc1, instead of Bd6, Ba3 then Bd6 should be considered for your opponent. | |
| Sep 10, 2016 at 20:09 | history | edited | Glorfindel♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body; edited title
|
| Sep 10, 2016 at 19:57 | history | edited | Koblenz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 8 characters in body
|
| Sep 10, 2016 at 19:53 | comment | added | Koblenz | Corrected. But yeah, I tought about c4 first without seeing the c5 possibility ... ! | |
| Sep 10, 2016 at 18:26 | comment | added | Scounged | Maybe you could switch up the move order, and play c4 first. That way Bd6 is impossible, due to c5. And one more note: it's never very interesting to know the "the best move for you". A move is either good, ok or bad, and that NEVER depends on the player. It ONLY depends on the current position on the board. | |
| Sep 10, 2016 at 18:08 | history | asked | Koblenz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |