Timeline for slav defense, black's bishop early development punishment
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2016 at 18:11 | answer | added | InfiniteFlash | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 27, 2015 at 14:38 | answer | added | Gene Eric | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 30, 2014 at 5:27 | answer | added | Virus | timeline score: -4 | |
| Dec 21, 2014 at 20:06 | comment | added | Dag Oskar Madsen |
@BlindKungFuMaster: 2... Bf5 is interesting, but shouldn't be combined with c6. The bishop move in those Slav positions (before dxc4) is usually bad.
|
|
| Dec 16, 2014 at 8:52 | comment | added | BlindKungFuMaster | There has actually been a book about bringing the bishop out even earlier: newinchess.com/The_Liberated_Bishop_Defence-p-9002.html | |
| Dec 6, 2014 at 9:27 | comment | added | Aravind | You can find some explanation here: tartajubow.blogspot.in/2010/11/janowsky-capablanca.html | |
| Dec 4, 2014 at 10:21 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackChess/status/540450829351002112 | ||
| Dec 4, 2014 at 9:16 | comment | added | BlindKungFuMaster | You probably mixed it up with 5…Nd5 6.Qb3 Qb6 7.Nd5 Qb3 and now 8.Nc7 ... | |
| Dec 4, 2014 at 9:04 | history | edited | Marco | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Dec 4, 2014 at 9:03 | comment | added | Marco | Sorry... I correct it | |
| S Dec 4, 2014 at 1:31 | history | suggested | Eduardo Almeida dos Santos | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I just put the moves in the chess board for easier comprehension
|
| Dec 4, 2014 at 1:05 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 4, 2014 at 1:31 | |||||
| Dec 3, 2014 at 23:04 | comment | added | kahen | Why would you think i) is very good for white? It just loses a piece. Now, if you had written 8.Nxf6+ instead... | |
| Dec 3, 2014 at 22:37 | history | asked | Marco | CC BY-SA 3.0 |