Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 8, 2023 at 12:24 comment added John Tromp For reference, see the section "Estimation from million sized samples" in the given link. Which also shows my objective use of "accurate", in that the 95% error bounds justify 2 digits of precision.
Mar 8, 2023 at 6:50 comment added user30536 I now see that the original author approved of the changes -- so I withdraw my question.
Mar 7, 2023 at 20:15 comment added Glorfindel @user30536 since the editor is the one being quoted, it makes sense, but we (the Chess.SE community) may roll it back if no clarification follows.
Mar 7, 2023 at 17:53 comment added user30536 Is the editor hijacking the answer here? Is that really allowed?
Mar 7, 2023 at 13:11 comment added Glorfindel @JohnTromp and 'accurate' is subjective - you might want to add the uncertainty.
S Mar 7, 2023 at 13:10 history suggested John Tromp CC BY-SA 4.0
increased accuracy
Mar 7, 2023 at 11:50 comment added Dag Oskar Madsen @JohnTromp Do you have a new reference?
Mar 7, 2023 at 11:45 review Suggested edits
S Mar 7, 2023 at 13:10
S Aug 11, 2021 at 8:24 history suggested John Tromp CC BY-SA 4.0
reformat reference
Aug 10, 2021 at 15:06 review Suggested edits
S Aug 11, 2021 at 8:24
Jul 21, 2020 at 12:34 history edited Dag Oskar Madsen CC BY-SA 4.0
corrected spelling of name
Jun 16, 2014 at 10:11 comment added shoonya However this can be computed to a far better estimate, especially the cases when Kings are already in checks, Kings are simultaneously in check. The key thing being estimating this can allow us to typically find the optimal moves for a given position.
Jun 16, 2014 at 9:34 comment added shoonya The article fairly estimates the positions to be close to 10^50. Link is nwchess.com/articles/misc/Chess_Board_Positions_article.pdf
Jun 15, 2014 at 11:32 history edited Dag Oskar Madsen CC BY-SA 3.0
added 49 characters in body
Jun 15, 2014 at 8:44 history answered Dag Oskar Madsen CC BY-SA 3.0