Timeline for Trying to understand evaluation
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29 at 16:40 | history | edited | JP Alioto | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 267 characters in body
|
| Feb 29 at 14:08 | comment | added | SecretAgentMan | @emdio I hope you will post an answer with this image with NNUE derived piece values. It is very interesting and certainly adds value for future visitors. It would complement JP Alioto's excellent answer nicely. | |
| Feb 29 at 13:23 | history | edited | JP Alioto | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 22 characters in body
|
| Feb 29 at 13:21 | comment | added | JP Alioto | @emdio Interesting. Thank you for posting that. I'll look into that capability. I will add "for me" :) | |
| Feb 29 at 8:41 | comment | added | emdio | "Engine evaluations are not that useful anymore." The thing is that SF now provides an interesting diagram with the static evaluation. It provides a score for each piece on the board Note for example the huge (+5.44) value of the white bishop on e6, and how the black queen has almost the same value as the white bishop (which to me it's not that easy to understand). | |
| Feb 28 at 16:58 | history | edited | JP Alioto | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 54 characters in body
|
| Feb 28 at 16:52 | history | answered | JP Alioto | CC BY-SA 4.0 |