Timeline for Is Sadler's 2000 book Queen's Gambit Declined focused on white or black?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2022 at 13:22 | vote | accept | Anna | ||
| Oct 3, 2022 at 10:48 | answer | added | David | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 2, 2022 at 14:27 | answer | added | Matthew Sadler | timeline score: 9 | |
| Oct 1, 2022 at 22:32 | answer | added | Beginner | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 1, 2022 at 11:21 | comment | added | Anna | @Beginner I'm not below 2000 Elo, apologies if I gave this impression | |
| Sep 25, 2022 at 19:59 | comment | added | Anna | Thank you for the book recommendations, I'll check them out! | |
| Sep 25, 2022 at 15:12 | comment | added | Inertial Ignorance | @Anna In addition to cmgchess' suggestion, "The Queen's Gambit Declined: Move by Move" could be a good - this series tends to focus more on explanations of plans and such. If you're more advanced and care more about the theory itself, there's "Playing 1.d4 d5: A Classical Repertoire". These books are both from 2017, so while not cutting edge they aren't too old either. | |
| Sep 25, 2022 at 7:35 | comment | added | cmgchess | Nils Grandelius has a chessable course called 'Magnus Queen's Gambit' , a modern way of playing QGD | |
| Sep 25, 2022 at 0:11 | comment | added | Anna | Thank you, I don't usually play Queen's Gambit so I didn't know. I've just heard a lot of praise for this particular one. What "modern" book would you recommend for QGD as black? | |
| Sep 24, 2022 at 18:34 | comment | added | Brian Towers♦ | Any opening book that is more than 20 years old is really only of interest or use to chess historians. Theory moves at far too fast a pace for you to be able to rely on lines in books that old. | |
| Sep 24, 2022 at 17:18 | history | asked | Anna | CC BY-SA 4.0 |