Skip to main content
added 6 characters in body
Source Link
ferdy
  • 4.2k
  • 8
  • 19

We cannot query on it as it is not supported by the protocol. However we can do something about it. I tried to maintain the uci protocol and added an issue with the following proposal.

Proposal 1

Support the command optionvalues. This command is sent to the engine. Some examples on engine reply format.

option name Threads value 2
option name Ponder value true
option name EvalFile value mynn.nnue

Feel free to post, comment or add your proposal in that repo.

I will inform the engine programmers community about this issue as well, so that they can support this on their engine.

By the way this is the usage of uci command.

* uci
    Tells the engine to use the uci (universal chess interface),
    this will be sent once as a first command after program boot
    to tell the engine to switch to uci mode.
    After receiving the uci command the engine must identify itself with the "id" command
    and send the "option" commands to tell the GUI which engine settings the engine supports if
    any. After that the engine should send "uciok" to acknowledge the uci mode. If no uciok is sent
    within a certain time period, the engine task will be killed by the GUI.

What is your use case why you query the current engine optionsoption values? From a gui's perspective, it can store option values that it sent to the engine.

We cannot query on it as it is not supported by the protocol. However we can do something about it. I tried to maintain the uci protocol and added an issue with the following proposal.

Proposal 1

Support the command optionvalues. This command is sent to the engine. Some examples on engine reply format.

option name Threads value 2
option name Ponder value true
option name EvalFile value mynn.nnue

Feel free to post, comment or add your proposal in that repo.

I will inform the engine programmers community about this issue as well, so that they can support this on their engine.

By the way this is the usage of uci command.

* uci
    Tells the engine to use the uci (universal chess interface),
    this will be sent once as a first command after program boot
    to tell the engine to switch to uci mode.
    After receiving the uci command the engine must identify itself with the "id" command
    and send the "option" commands to tell the GUI which engine settings the engine supports if
    any. After that the engine should send "uciok" to acknowledge the uci mode. If no uciok is sent
    within a certain time period, the engine task will be killed by the GUI.

What is your use case why you query the current engine options? From a gui's perspective, it can store option values that it sent to the engine.

We cannot query on it as it is not supported by the protocol. However we can do something about it. I tried to maintain the uci protocol and added an issue with the following proposal.

Proposal 1

Support the command optionvalues. This command is sent to the engine. Some examples on engine reply format.

option name Threads value 2
option name Ponder value true
option name EvalFile value mynn.nnue

Feel free to post, comment or add your proposal in that repo.

I will inform the engine programmers community about this issue as well, so that they can support this on their engine.

By the way this is the usage of uci command.

* uci
    Tells the engine to use the uci (universal chess interface),
    this will be sent once as a first command after program boot
    to tell the engine to switch to uci mode.
    After receiving the uci command the engine must identify itself with the "id" command
    and send the "option" commands to tell the GUI which engine settings the engine supports if
    any. After that the engine should send "uciok" to acknowledge the uci mode. If no uciok is sent
    within a certain time period, the engine task will be killed by the GUI.

What is your use case why you query the current engine option values? From a gui's perspective, it can store option values that it sent to the engine.

added 742 characters in body
Source Link
ferdy
  • 4.2k
  • 8
  • 19

We cannot query on it as it is not supported by the protocol. However we can do something about it. I tried to maintain the uci protocol and added an issue with the following proposal.

Proposal 1

Support the command optionvalues. This command is sent to the engine. Some examples on engine reply format.

option name Threads value 2
option name Ponder value true
option name EvalFile value mynn.nnue

Feel free to post, comment or add your proposal in that repo.

I will inform the engine programmers community about this issue as well, so that they can support this on their engine.

By the way this is the usage of uci command.

* uci
    Tells the engine to use the uci (universal chess interface),
    this will be sent once as a first command after program boot
    to tell the engine to switch to uci mode.
    After receiving the uci command the engine must identify itself with the "id" command
    and send the "option" commands to tell the GUI which engine settings the engine supports if
    any. After that the engine should send "uciok" to acknowledge the uci mode. If no uciok is sent
    within a certain time period, the engine task will be killed by the GUI.

What is your use case why you query the current engine options? From a gui's perspective, it can store option values that it sent to the engine.

We cannot query on it as it is not supported by the protocol. However we can do something about it. I tried to maintain the uci protocol and added an issue with the following proposal.

Proposal 1

Support the command optionvalues. This command is sent to the engine. Some examples on engine reply format.

option name Threads value 2
option name Ponder value true
option name EvalFile value mynn.nnue

Feel free to post, comment or add your proposal in that repo.

I will inform the engine programmers community about this issue as well, so that they can support this on their engine.

We cannot query on it as it is not supported by the protocol. However we can do something about it. I tried to maintain the uci protocol and added an issue with the following proposal.

Proposal 1

Support the command optionvalues. This command is sent to the engine. Some examples on engine reply format.

option name Threads value 2
option name Ponder value true
option name EvalFile value mynn.nnue

Feel free to post, comment or add your proposal in that repo.

I will inform the engine programmers community about this issue as well, so that they can support this on their engine.

By the way this is the usage of uci command.

* uci
    Tells the engine to use the uci (universal chess interface),
    this will be sent once as a first command after program boot
    to tell the engine to switch to uci mode.
    After receiving the uci command the engine must identify itself with the "id" command
    and send the "option" commands to tell the GUI which engine settings the engine supports if
    any. After that the engine should send "uciok" to acknowledge the uci mode. If no uciok is sent
    within a certain time period, the engine task will be killed by the GUI.

What is your use case why you query the current engine options? From a gui's perspective, it can store option values that it sent to the engine.

Source Link
ferdy
  • 4.2k
  • 8
  • 19

We cannot query on it as it is not supported by the protocol. However we can do something about it. I tried to maintain the uci protocol and added an issue with the following proposal.

Proposal 1

Support the command optionvalues. This command is sent to the engine. Some examples on engine reply format.

option name Threads value 2
option name Ponder value true
option name EvalFile value mynn.nnue

Feel free to post, comment or add your proposal in that repo.

I will inform the engine programmers community about this issue as well, so that they can support this on their engine.