Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 5, 2021 at 22:15 history edited BCLC CC BY-SA 4.0
or stalemate
Jan 17, 2021 at 4:20 vote accept Owen Kelvin
Jan 15, 2021 at 0:13 comment added Steve Bennett I think the more interesting question here is, should Carlsen resign if he somehow blunders a rook.
Jan 14, 2021 at 7:09 review Suggested edits
Jan 14, 2021 at 9:52
Jan 13, 2021 at 16:54 comment added David Schwartz @CaptainMan Personally, when I have an opportunity to compete against someone who is vastly superior to me, I would take full advantage of it. If a better opponent exposed a weakness in how I opened matches, I might prefer to resign early and attempt to improve my openings by playing more games. That assumes time was the limit, however-- if I was limited to a particular number of matches, I agree that I'd probably draw them out a bit more. I think QueensKnight is still right in spirit, though, because an aspect of "sportsmanship" is respecting my opponent's time.
Jan 13, 2021 at 14:02 comment added Captain Man Wouldn't most players play the whole game against him since he is famous and it is a fun opportunity?
S Jan 13, 2021 at 12:06 history suggested psmears CC BY-SA 4.0
Improve wording and grammar
Jan 13, 2021 at 10:35 review Suggested edits
S Jan 13, 2021 at 12:06
Jan 13, 2021 at 2:48 comment added Esther I don't think the "Carlsen doesn't blunder" or "Carlsen is expected to leverage his advantage" argument holds up. Carlsen straight-up doesn't lose to players below a certain rank, a similar line of argument would suggest that these lower-ranked players should resign as soon as they sit across the board from him, because "Carlsen is obviously expected to win against", or "Carlsen doesn't lose to" these players.
Jan 12, 2021 at 9:50 history answered QueensKnight CC BY-SA 4.0