Skip to main content
Chess

Return to Answer

deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
postoronnim
postoronnim
  • 1k
  • 1
  • 7
  • 11

The statement is probably correct, but dangerous if taken the wrong way. Tactics are born out of strategy, and  , during the game, you might be spending 90% of your time trying to find those tactics, but it will be fruitless if your strategic plan sucks. It should not mean that you must be spending 90% of your time studying tactics. Strategy comes first, if you master that the tactics will come easy.

The statement is probably correct, but dangerous if taken the wrong way. Tactics are born out of strategy, and  , during the game, you might be spending 90% of your time trying to find those tactics, but it will be fruitless if your strategic plan sucks. It should not mean that you must be spending 90% of your time studying tactics. Strategy comes first, if you master that the tactics will come easy.

The statement is probably correct, but dangerous if taken the wrong way. Tactics are born out of strategy, and, during the game, you might be spending 90% of your time trying to find those tactics, but it will be fruitless if your strategic plan sucks. It should not mean that you must be spending 90% of your time studying tactics. Strategy comes first, if you master that the tactics will come easy.

Source Link
postoronnim
postoronnim
  • 1k
  • 1
  • 7
  • 11

The statement is probably correct, but dangerous if taken the wrong way. Tactics are born out of strategy, and , during the game, you might be spending 90% of your time trying to find those tactics, but it will be fruitless if your strategic plan sucks. It should not mean that you must be spending 90% of your time studying tactics. Strategy comes first, if you master that the tactics will come easy.