Skip to main content
Chess

Return to Question

Question Protected by Ellie
Tweeted twitter.com/StackChess/status/1072053451058745345
Fix typo
Source Link
Brian Towers ♦
Brian Towers ♦
  • 100.3k
  • 13
  • 247
  • 410

Am wondering if it is possible for a move to be considered "good" by engines but is rejected by professional human players. One possible reason that I can think of is that the in order for this move to be successful, one has to play exactly right for the next 20 moves or so, which is easy for eiginesengines but difficult for human players.

Am wondering if it is possible for a move to be considered "good" by engines but is rejected by professional human players. One possible reason that I can think of is that the in order for this move to be successful, one has to play exactly right for the next 20 moves or so, which is easy for eigines but difficult for human players.

Am wondering if it is possible for a move to be considered "good" by engines but is rejected by professional human players. One possible reason that I can think of is that the in order for this move to be successful, one has to play exactly right for the next 20 moves or so, which is easy for engines but difficult for human players.

Source Link
Zuriel
Zuriel
  • 9.3k
  • 6
  • 43
  • 102

Is it possible for a move to be recomended by engines but rejected by professional human players?

Am wondering if it is possible for a move to be considered "good" by engines but is rejected by professional human players. One possible reason that I can think of is that the in order for this move to be successful, one has to play exactly right for the next 20 moves or so, which is easy for eigines but difficult for human players.