Timeline for Reasonable engines to test against (Not StockFish)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2023 at 16:37 | history | edited | Laschet Jain | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed grammar
|
| Aug 16, 2018 at 18:37 | comment | added | Fernando | @LaschetJain I'm checking it right now, thank you! | |
| Aug 16, 2018 at 18:36 | comment | added | Laschet Jain | @Fernando This feature was added around 2 months ago. | |
| Aug 16, 2018 at 18:35 | comment | added | Fernando | Damn, I didn't knew you could setup a bot account there! | |
| Jul 23, 2018 at 5:44 | vote | accept | Sam Ragusa | ||
| Jul 7, 2018 at 7:03 | comment | added | Laschet Jain | But both the BOTs will restricted to little time, right? So I guess the optimal BOT would search more depth than the weaker BOT doesn't matter the time. Regarding performance given low time, I would suggest checking out this video, where a human defeat a strong engine in hyperbullet match streamerclips.com/twitch/penguingm1/RefinedAverageLaptopRedCoat. | |
| Jul 7, 2018 at 2:30 | comment | added | Sam Ragusa | That seems particularly enticing! Competing against a top-tier engine restricted to very little time is more appealing for obvious reasons, but I have concerns that the elo/give_time curve might not behave as I expect, and cause weird/undesirable results. When restricted to very little time, would top-tier engines play similarly to the less strong engines? | |
| Jul 6, 2018 at 21:21 | history | answered | Laschet Jain | CC BY-SA 4.0 |