Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 11, 2018 at 10:10 comment added Glorfindel Welcome to Chess Stack Exchange! Please read the tour and the help center to get familiar with the site.
May 11, 2018 at 7:35 comment added Annatar Last, developing your bishop to g2 and castling on that side actually is a very sound idea. But why place the knight on h3? Knights want to be close to the centre because they lack range. On h3, your knight has minimal effect. On f3 instead, it attacks two centre squares.
May 11, 2018 at 7:33 comment added Annatar Second, rooks should be developed by opening a file (i.e., trade away your own pawn on that file) so they can attack vertically, from the safety of your back rank towards your opponent's camp. "Developing" to a3 while you still have a pawn on a5 is very ineffective, the pawn will block your rook as if it still was on a1. The horizontal range on the third rank isn't all that great either, your rook will need at least one other move to join an attack, and chances are that most of the third rank is blocked by your own pieces, too (e.g. knight or pawn on c3).
May 11, 2018 at 7:28 comment added Annatar First, your pawn on a5 is too far advanced, it will become an easy attack mark for your opponent, who you handed the opportunity to grab the centre for free. If you try to defend a5 (e.g. by playing b4, you waste even more tempo with non-developing moves while creating even more holes in your pawn structure. And what is that pawn doing on a5 anyway? Attacking b6? Your opponent can is fine without control of that square if he can get the centre and the initiative instead.
May 11, 2018 at 7:20 comment added Annatar Idk how serious you are, but this is very bad advice for beginners. This setup is just very against anyone with at least a tiny bit advanced skill.
May 11, 2018 at 1:44 review Late answers
May 11, 2018 at 10:10
May 11, 2018 at 1:29 review First posts
May 11, 2018 at 10:09
May 11, 2018 at 1:25 history answered Joel CC BY-SA 4.0