Timeline for Kasparov said human+computer beats just computer. What does human bring to the table in such teams?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2023 at 20:43 | comment | added | user904963 | Keep in mind that Elo isn't an absolute number. It makes little sense listing the Elo of an engine that got its rating playing other engines alongside a human's Elo that they got playing primarily top humans. To see this, imagine if there were some ultra genius 6 year old. Maybe, he plays at the level of a decent IM, but his rating, against other young children, might be 3500 Elo. Despite this tremendous number, he would lose more often than win against adult grandmasters. Basically, Elo comparisons can only be done if the two players got their ratings against the same population. | |
| Dec 30, 2019 at 0:50 | history | edited | Rewan Demontay | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Nov 11, 2017 at 21:24 | comment | added | jf328 | @bof, no it doesn't. That's why I used "evidence", not "proof" | |
| Nov 11, 2017 at 12:09 | comment | added | bof | The match shows that Nakamura + Rybka was weaker than Stockfish, but how does it prove that Nakamura + Rybka was not stronger than unaided Rybka? | |
| Nov 10, 2017 at 11:24 | history | answered | jf328 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |