Timeline for Kasparov said human+computer beats just computer. What does human bring to the table in such teams?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 30, 2019 at 19:48 | comment | added | bpromas | My guess is Kasparov is still hurt by his loss to Deep Blue and wants to find some way humans can still be relevant to chess ;) | |
Dec 30, 2019 at 0:15 | answer | added | Allure | timeline score: 3 | |
Nov 17, 2017 at 7:23 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackChess/status/931422575036719109 | ||
Nov 14, 2017 at 20:23 | comment | added | Paul Burchett | Some good answers. Let me add the following article, which illustrates one legal chess position in which the human mind is better than any computer. While such positions seem very contrived and artificial, although legal, their study might lead to an answer to your question. telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/03/14/… | |
Nov 12, 2017 at 4:03 | answer | added | SmallChess | timeline score: 12 | |
Nov 10, 2017 at 11:24 | answer | added | jf328 | timeline score: 7 | |
Nov 10, 2017 at 11:07 | comment | added | Sejanus | @bof december 2016, I edited in the link | |
Nov 10, 2017 at 11:07 | history | edited | Sejanus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 144 characters in body
|
Nov 10, 2017 at 0:47 | comment | added | user1583209 | I seem to remember matches human+computer vs human+computer, but did anybody actually try human + computer vs computer only? | |
Nov 9, 2017 at 23:03 | answer | added | Fred Knight | timeline score: 4 | |
Nov 9, 2017 at 22:56 | comment | added | Jimmy360 | Positional understanding | |
Nov 9, 2017 at 21:38 | comment | added | Xetrov | My guess is that a computer thinks logically, and just calculates the best move coming, but a human person would be able to "see" any "possibility" of a tactic being pulled off... | |
Nov 9, 2017 at 18:49 | review | First posts | |||
Nov 9, 2017 at 20:54 | |||||
Nov 9, 2017 at 18:48 | history | asked | Sejanus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |