Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 30, 2019 at 19:48 comment added bpromas My guess is Kasparov is still hurt by his loss to Deep Blue and wants to find some way humans can still be relevant to chess ;)
Dec 30, 2019 at 0:15 answer added Allure timeline score: 3
Nov 17, 2017 at 7:23 history tweeted twitter.com/StackChess/status/931422575036719109
Nov 14, 2017 at 20:23 comment added Paul Burchett Some good answers. Let me add the following article, which illustrates one legal chess position in which the human mind is better than any computer. While such positions seem very contrived and artificial, although legal, their study might lead to an answer to your question. telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/03/14/…
Nov 12, 2017 at 4:03 answer added SmallChess timeline score: 12
Nov 10, 2017 at 11:24 answer added jf328 timeline score: 7
Nov 10, 2017 at 11:07 comment added Sejanus @bof december 2016, I edited in the link
Nov 10, 2017 at 11:07 history edited Sejanus CC BY-SA 3.0
added 144 characters in body
Nov 10, 2017 at 0:47 comment added user1583209 I seem to remember matches human+computer vs human+computer, but did anybody actually try human + computer vs computer only?
Nov 9, 2017 at 23:03 answer added Fred Knight timeline score: 4
Nov 9, 2017 at 22:56 comment added Jimmy360 Positional understanding
Nov 9, 2017 at 21:38 comment added Xetrov My guess is that a computer thinks logically, and just calculates the best move coming, but a human person would be able to "see" any "possibility" of a tactic being pulled off...
Nov 9, 2017 at 18:49 review First posts
Nov 9, 2017 at 20:54
Nov 9, 2017 at 18:48 history asked Sejanus CC BY-SA 3.0