Timeline for How to learn chess if you're still a 3-digit rating after a few years
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2020 at 2:04 | history | edited | user24344 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Feb 9, 2017 at 7:27 | history | edited | AA_PV | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Adding from the comments
|
| Feb 7, 2017 at 10:53 | comment | added | AA_PV | @DavidRicherby I myself haven't gone very far into either "My System" or "Art of Attack", so maybe you are right about the Part 2 on positional play. Part 1 otherwise should not be too difficult, with a chessboard and some patience, IMO. I might be lacking perspective though, I haven't taught or such. | |
| Feb 7, 2017 at 10:47 | comment | added | AA_PV | @DavidRicherby As the post subtitle says, "It’s been a year since I started playing chess and this is a post for anyone who knows what piece moves how, hasn’t ever played and would like to." It's just an attempt at trying to share the delta I think I learnt in my first year. | |
| Feb 7, 2017 at 10:43 | comment | added | David Richerby | Also, "My System" is far too advanced for the asker. | |
| Feb 7, 2017 at 10:42 | comment | added | David Richerby | Honestly, I'm sceptical of beginners writing "chess for beginners" guides. I admit that I didn't read yours, especially as it starts with several paragraphs of history that I didn't much want to go through. But beginners generally lack the perspective required to write a good guide. A good guide is a distillation of knowledge, understanding and experience; beginners don't have much of any of those things. | |
| Feb 7, 2017 at 9:50 | history | edited | AA_PV | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
making answer clearer
|
| Feb 7, 2017 at 9:41 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 7, 2017 at 9:46 | |||||
| Feb 7, 2017 at 9:40 | history | answered | AA_PV | CC BY-SA 3.0 |