There is no check. Was it a victory byon time out? Or did Shirov resign? In all the discussion over this match, itsgame it's just taken accepted that Kasparov won, and is not mentioned howwithout anyone mentioning the reason for his victory. And it is so often called a great matchgame, whereas I don't see any great brilliance. Just 2 guys trading blows. That too EQUALLY. There's hardly a significant difference in material atin the last movefinal position.
There is no check. Was it a victory by time out? Or did Shirov resign? In all the discussion over this match, its just taken accepted Kasparov won, and is not mentioned how. And it is so often called a great match, whereas I don't see any great brilliance. Just 2 guys trading blows. That too EQUALLY. There's hardly a significant difference in material at the last move.
There is no check. Was it a victory on time? Or did Shirov resign? In all the discussion over this game it's just accepted that Kasparov won, without anyone mentioning the reason for his victory. And it is so often called a great game, whereas I don't see any great brilliance. Just 2 guys trading blows. There's hardly a significant difference in material in the final position.
There
There is no check. Was it a victory by time out? Or did Shirov resign? In all the discussion over this match, its just taken accepted Kasparov won, and is not mentioned how. And it is so often called a great match, whereas I don't see any great brilliance. Just 2 guys trading blows. That too EQUALLY. There's hardly a significant difference in material at the last move.
There is no check.
Was it a victory by time out? Or did Shirov resign?
In all the discussion over this match, its just taken accepted Kasparov won, and is not mentioned how.
And it is so often called a great match, whereas I don't see any great brilliance. Just 2 guys trading blows. That too EQUALLY.
There's hardly a significant difference in material at the last move.
There is no check. Was it a victory by time out? Or did Shirov resign? In all the discussion over this match, its just taken accepted Kasparov won, and is not mentioned how. And it is so often called a great match, whereas I don't see any great brilliance. Just 2 guys trading blows. That too EQUALLY. There's hardly a significant difference in material at the last move.
There is no check.
Was it a victory by time out? Or did Shirov resign?
In all the discussion over this match, its just taken accepted Kasparov won, and is not mentioned how.
And it is so often called a great match, whereas I don't see any great brilliance. Just 2 guys trading blows. That too EQUALLY.
There's hardly a significant difference in material at the last move.
