Timeline for Should I play a risky combination when I don't see the refutation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2016 at 23:34 | answer | added | jaxter | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 21, 2016 at 12:54 | answer | added | Priyome | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 21, 2016 at 3:32 | answer | added | Tom Au | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 20, 2016 at 17:33 | answer | added | aschultz | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 19, 2016 at 16:10 | answer | added | ebann | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 19, 2016 at 13:31 | comment | added | antoyo | @RemcoGerlich I edited the title to avoid such a confusion :) . | |
| Sep 19, 2016 at 13:30 | history | edited | antoyo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Sep 19, 2016 at 13:15 | comment | added | RemcoGerlich | Well, the alternative is to only play combinations when you do see the refutation... | |
| Sep 19, 2016 at 1:56 | comment | added | limits | Use your intuition. | |
| Sep 18, 2016 at 18:19 | vote | accept | antoyo | ||
| Sep 18, 2016 at 14:27 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackChess/status/777514423992844290 | ||
| Sep 18, 2016 at 6:46 | comment | added | EMBLEM | Gary Lane advises having a long think before decisive moves. I can't tell you how many times I've spotted blunders in this fashion. | |
| Sep 18, 2016 at 4:46 | answer | added | Herb | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 18, 2016 at 3:31 | answer | added | bof | timeline score: 8 | |
| Sep 18, 2016 at 2:12 | answer | added | Joshua | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 17, 2016 at 23:15 | answer | added | AS3Noob | timeline score: 6 | |
| Sep 17, 2016 at 21:57 | history | edited | antoyo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 38 characters in body
|
| Sep 17, 2016 at 21:49 | history | asked | antoyo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |