Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 10, 2020 at 16:56 answer added yobamamama timeline score: 2
Jun 24, 2016 at 18:22 answer added Lazov timeline score: 1
Jun 21, 2016 at 18:18 comment added Priyome Solving a tactical position is not the same. In games, you don't know there is a tactic. When you solve positions, you know there is something to find. Big difference. I am good at tactics too, being a Cat A player, but miss things regularly in my games. the two things do not correlate. The reason we do tactical puzzles is to see more positions and to become familiar with what tactical shots might be there. We don't do them for some fake rating.
Jun 21, 2016 at 16:52 comment added Randy Minder So can a lot of people when they are not under pressure or on the clock or wondering what tactics their opponent are looking at.
Jun 21, 2016 at 16:47 comment added Prakhar Londhe @RandyMinder no, I mean I can solve tactics when not-in-game.
Jun 21, 2016 at 16:43 comment added Randy Minder If you could solve tactics quite easily over the board, your rating would be FAR higher than 1500. At 1500 you're missing far more tactics than you are seeing.
Jun 21, 2016 at 16:39 comment added Prakhar Londhe @RandyMinder hmm thanks... I mean I am able to solve tactics quite easily overboard, but not so on the positional aspects of game... Still I believe there is long way to go ahead :D
Jun 21, 2016 at 13:49 comment added Randy Minder I would caution you to think you are better at tactics than you really are. A rating of 1500 indicates you are probably not all that good. Until you reach a rating of 1800+, positional chess matters far less than spotting tactic opportunities.
Jun 21, 2016 at 12:40 history edited Glorfindel CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body; edited title
Jun 21, 2016 at 9:40 answer added Jester timeline score: 3
Jun 21, 2016 at 6:57 history asked Prakhar Londhe CC BY-SA 3.0