User Элси Ринген

3 votes

2 answers

267 views

Have problems similar to this recent composition of mine been done before?

asked Jun 14 at 13:42

3 votes

1 answer

348 views

Why is the abbreviated retronotation not used?

asked Jun 24 at 23:47

3 votes

3 answers

264 views

What conditions must/should be added to this fairy selfmate stipulation?

asked Jun 29 at 15:10

3 votes

2 answers

444 views

How does this problem relate to the 50 & 75 move rules?

asked Jul 11 at 14:37

3 votes

3 answers

111 views

Does this problem work under the standard AP condition?

asked Jul 14 at 18:17

2 votes

2 answers

403 views

Show an AP Type Keym #n, where Black's castling illegality with WTM drives both basic White mate & AP?

asked Jun 25 at 8:13

2 votes

2 answers

183 views

Can the problem condition "A Posteriori Type Keym", which flips the player to move, also flip the player that delivers mate?

asked Jun 20 at 18:27

2 votes

1 answer

108 views

Is Retro Zugzwang possible?

asked Jun 20 at 19:54

1 vote

1 answer

132 views

Does the AP Convention and Rule 16.2 allow E.P. to be performed without justification?

asked Jul 3 at 13:23

1 vote

2 answers

74 views

Is the RS method actually a convention? If so, what can be written in it that is not in 16.1 and 16.2?

asked Jul 7 at 15:36

0 votes

2 answers

155 views

What's the answer to this castling rights problem?

asked Jul 23 at 8:35

-2 votes

2 answers

250 views

What is the correct retro protocol for this problem? PRA or RS?

asked Jul 3 at 21:05

Stack Exchange Network

12 Questions

Have problems similar to this recent composition of mine been done before?

Why is the abbreviated retronotation not used?

What conditions must/should be added to this fairy selfmate stipulation?

How does this problem relate to the 50 & 75 move rules?

Does this problem work under the standard AP condition?

Show an AP Type Keym #n, where Black's castling illegality with WTM drives both basic White mate & AP?

Can the problem condition "A Posteriori Type Keym", which flips the player to move, also flip the player that delivers mate?

Is Retro Zugzwang possible?

Does the AP Convention and Rule 16.2 allow E.P. to be performed without justification?

Is the RS method actually a convention? If so, what can be written in it that is not in 16.1 and 16.2?

What's the answer to this castling rights problem?

What is the correct retro protocol for this problem? PRA or RS?