10
No. Black cannot reach the Hanham variation (e.g. the Philidor setup with Nd7, Nf6, e5 and sometimes c6) by force.
The modern move order to reach the Hanham variation, however, is 1. e4 d6! 2. d4 Nf6 3. Nc3 e5. This is black's best move order to reach the Hanham variation because white usually transposes to the Hanham variation with 4. Nf3.
Experienced ...
8
If you don't take on d5, I think the only advantage black has gained is flexibility. That means he can choose his opening according to your move. But you can be almost 100% sure that the opening will be transposed into some traditional line so white can't be worse, for example:
Slav Defence:
[FEN ""]
1. d4 d5 2. c4 Nf6?! 3. Nc3 (3. Nf3 c6) c6 {with the ...
8
I apologize for posting a comment as an answer, but this is the only way for me to include diagrams, which I find helpful.
You have entered Advanced French defense by transposition.
After 1.e4 d5 2. e5 e6 3.d4 we get the following position:
[StartFlipped "0"]
[fen "rnbqkbnr/ppp2ppp/4p3/3pP3/3P4/8/PPP2PPP/RNBQKBNR b KQkq - 0 3"]
The usual way of reaching ...
answered May 19 '20 at 20:22
AlwaysLearningNewStuff
11.3k2 gold badges24 silver badges54 bronze badges
7
It is a matter of choice
Many grandmasters (e.g. world champion Viswanathan Anand) have consistently played 1.c4 e5 with Black. Others favour the KID or other defenses : Hedgehog (with b6), symmetrical English (1.c4 c5), Pseudo-Nimzo (with Nf6 and e6), Pseudo-Grünfeld (with Nf6 and d5), Réti (with e6 and d5) or Slav-like (with c6 and d5) defenses...
There is ...
7
After 5....b5 6.Bb3 Be7, white has the strong option to play 7.d4. Now, 7....exd4 is a mistake, as white obtains a big advantage after 8.e5 Ne4 9.Bd5, which was played in Grischuk-Nepomniachtchi (blitz). Instead, 7....d6 is more stubborn.
In contrast, after 5....Be7, 6.d4 is relatively harmless for black, for example 6....exd4 7.e5 Ne4 8.Re1 Nc5.
[...
6
You need to realize that just because someone gave it that name on move two, that it is certainly going to transpose to another opening with a different name. When determining what opening is played, classification takes place from the end of the game, and moves backward so the last known opening position is considered the opening that was played. If you ...
5
Another possible transposition after 3. Nc3:
After 1. d4 d5 2. c4 Nf6 3. Nc3 Nc6 we arrive at a variation of the Chigorin Defense.
A particularly tricky line is the following.
[FEN ""]
[Title "Chigorin Defense"]
[Startply "6"]
1. d4 d5 2. c4 Nf6 3. Nc3 Nc6 4. cxd5 Nxd5 5. e4 Nxc3 6. bxc3 e5
5
When you shut off the engine and turn it back on, its transposition table has been cleared. In order to continue using the saved positions, a database of some sort would be needed. This would keep getting bigger and bigger the more you used the engine though, and could become very inefficient for the engine to actually use to the sheer size.
If by a new game ...
4
As explained in the fine answer by AlwaysLearningNewStuff, you have transposed into the Advanced French.
Such transpositions are common in chess. That's why, if you are assigning an opening to a game you would normally go backwards and base it on the last known theoretical position in that game.
Concerning the moves of that game. 2. e5 is objectively not ...
4
No. You shouldn't count null-move in repetitions because:
Null-move is fake
Null-move artificially creates a repetition when there is none
Your implementation is correct, but you might want to exclude null-move. Let's take a look at Stockfish:
https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/blob/master/src/position.cpp
bool Position::is_draw(int ply) ...
3
With both move orders white can avoid the Benoni. The difference is all about which sidelines you allow and which ones you don't.
1. Nf3 c5 2. c4 is generally considered the most flexible move order for white since they can wait and play d4 at the moment of their choosing.
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 c5 3. Nf3 cxd4 4. Nxd4 on the other hand gives black extra options, ...
2
Can the Nc3+e3 Chebanenko Slav, the Exchange Slav and the 4…Bg4 Slow Slav transpose into each other?
No, they don't transpose to Exchange Slavs.
In the Slow Slav and the Chebanenko, white plays e3 to prevent trouble with the c4 pawn. The bishop stays inside the pawn chain which is somewhat passive, but the plus is that c4 is defended, so that black can't stir up trouble by taking it and defending it with ...b5.
In the Exchange, white has dealt with that ...
2
One transposition white can try is from the French Exchange variation (if you know your opponent plays the French).
[FEN ""]
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 exd5 4. c4 dxc4 (4... Nf6) 5. Bxc4
It transposes to the variation 1. d4 d5 2. c4 dxc4 3. e3 e5 4. Bxc4 exd4 5. exd4 from this question.
In the French move order, clever black players won't take the pawn on ...
2
EDIT: You seem to be concerned if the opening is "tournament tested." I can affirm that almost all of the mainstream openings are well-tested, and you can figure out what these are yourself by doing the appropriate research online (i.e, which openings are most commonly played. See the links I supplied with this post.)
It would be great if you could clarify ...
2
There are indeed a couple of transpositions from the Nimzo-Indian to the Panov variation of the Caro-Kann and they occur sometimes in practical games.
Using a database of chess games, they can be filtered by searching simultaneously on:
The position after 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4
"B10-B19", i.e. the ECO-code of the Caro-Kann.
After finding the games ...
2
Playing 2...Nf6 requires black's willingness to play 3.cxd5 c6 lines, because black really needs a pawn recapture on d5. If he is ok with that and is prepared schematically for the lines arising after white declines playing cxd5, then sure, why not. Chess, like life, sometimes does not have absolute answers, especially at sub-Master levels. It is more ...
2
Another well-known example is the following:
[fen ""]
1. f4 {Bird's Opening} 1... e5 {From Gambit} 2. e4 {King's Gambit} 2... d5 {Falkbeer Counter Gambit} 3. exd5 exf4 {King's Gambit Accepted}
A total of 5 distinct names.
Bird's Opening
From Gambit
King's Gambit
Falkbeer Counter Gambit
King's Gambit Accepted
2
I think what you are looking for is something like
https://chesstempo.com/opening-training/
or
https://openings.chessbase.com/
In both cases, you can build opening move trees (either for White or for Black - you train/drill one side per tree) by picking moves for any given position and the site will automatically handle transpositions for you if you reach ...
2
I am not sure I understand your exact code but my guess here is that you return a transposition table result, no matter the depth of the entry. So if you encounter a position and calculate it one ply deep, store it in the transposition table, and then the next iteration you want to search two plies deep but instead retrieve a one ply deep evaluation from the ...
1
A lot of players play a setup similar to their main response to d4 in order to narrow their rep. Maybe the positions are objectively a little inferior but it gets the player a position they know and are comfortable in while at the same reducing the theory they need to know.
1
I've toyed with this idea in the past but never played it seriously. If you're okay with the transpositions there is nothing wrong with it at all.
After 1.e4, e6 2. d4, c5 white has three main choices (3. dxc5, Bxc5 is obviously really bad for white)
Nf3, cxd4 transposes to an e6 Sicilian. There's nothing wrong with that
d5 is a Franco-Benoni. Black ...
1
What you're talking about is basically opening books. If an engine has access to hard-set evaluations of common positions fairly early on in the game, then it can play better.
But having a pre-made transposition table/database of positions occurring far after the opening isn't useful, since the chance of reaching any particular position late in the game is ...
1
Your question has two different nuances, that is, how to classify an opening and how to classify a game.
The Encyclopedia of Chess Openings' only aim is to classify the first moves of a chess game, it does not concern itself with how the game develops nor further transpositions. Even if a widely known position is reached after an unorthodox choice of moves, ...
1
The simple version, with no variations: With 1 Nf3 2 c4 White is basically declaring the desire not to play Benoni. And if Black decides to go for it willy-nilly, Black knows they will quite likely end up in various variations of the Queen's Indian, the QGD (probably Tarrasch) or the Sicilian, including many Maroczy Bind possibilities. So Black chooses ...
1
One of the main ideas of hypermodern defenses such as the Benoni is to chisel away at white's 'big' centre with moves like 2...c5 after 1.d4 Nf6, and 2.c4 (chewing away at the d4 pawn). A move order such as 1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 does not give black any target at d4 and black must be prepared for English-opening structures with white's pawn on d3(not d4). ...
Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible
