Skip to main content

New answers tagged

2 votes

Why does counterattacking lead to a more drawish and less dynamic position than defending?

You can hardly conclude from these two examples that counterattacks are more likely to lead to a drawish position. Would you conclude that too by looking at a King's Indian position, which is a ...
Nils Lindemann's user avatar
5 votes

Why does counterattacking lead to a more drawish and less dynamic position than defending?

Why does counterattacking lead to a more drawish and less dynamic position than defending? The obvious answer is, of course, that both your assumptions are wrong. 3 ply into the game where neutral ...
Brian Towers's user avatar
  • 100k
5 votes

Why does counterattacking lead to a more drawish and less dynamic position than defending?

Actually, both of these are defending. White's threat is to win a pawn, and both 2... Nc6 and 2... Nf6 are aiming to diffuse that threat: one by preventing White from taking the pawn in the first ...
Especially Lime's user avatar

Top 50 recent answers are included