I think that bullet is a skill that is half chess, but half is simply the ability to think and move quickly, which is the domain of young people. Yes, you can clearly get very good at it relative to your standard level of play. Your ratings seem to prove that.
I still question whether bullet is really good for your chess on a deeper level, but you do not ...
If the enemy king is cut off at the edge of the board, it is possible to mate him using only premoves. For example:
[FEN "2k5/Q7/8/8/8/8/8/K7 w - - 0 1"]
1.Ka2 Kd8 2.Ka3 Kc8 3.Ka4 Kd8 4.Ka5 Kc8 5.Ka6 Kd8 6.Qb7 Ke8 7.Kb6 Kd8 8.Qc7+ Ke8 9.Kc6 Kf8 10.Qd7 Kg8 11.Kd6 Kf8 12.Qe7+ Kg8 13.Ke6 Kh8 14.Kf6 (14.Qf7??=) Kg8 15.Qg7#
Just make sure ...
The origin for Ultrabullet on lichess in particular is an April's fools that somehow stuck around https://lichess.org/blog/WN7V-jAAAAdH8ITR/announcing-instant-chess .
Does it lead to quality games? Depends on what exactly you mean by that. If it is about "objectively good" play in the traditional sense, then the answer is no. Strategically it is ...
In some special cases you can "premove" to a forced mate even against
a King in the center:
8/8/8/8/3k4/7Q/3K4/8 w - - 0 0
1. Qe6! Kc5 2. Kc3! Kb5 3. Qd6! Ka5 4. Qb4+ Ka6 5. Kc4 Ka7 6. Qb5 Ka8
7. Kc5 Ka7 8.Kc6 Ka8 9. Qb7#
(Black's only option is 3...Ka4 when 4 Qb4 is already mate.
The alternative 1 Qf5!? Kc4 2 Qe5 Kb4(b3) 3 Qd5(+) or 3 Qc3+
might not be ...
I think with the black king on f7 it's also possible. For example, in the following position:
[FEN "8/5k2/3Q4/8/8/3K4/8/8 w - - 0 1"]
this sequence of moves for white checkmates always:
Ke4 Kf5 (go to f5 in two moves) Qd7 Kf6 Qh3 Qc8 Qa8 Qh1#
I made this gif to explain why:
In green it is shown where the black king could be (to consider all possibilities)...
When asking questions about tactics and sacrifices, chess engines are usually the most efficient and accurate way of determining the answer. The following is based on analysis from Houdini 6.03 in tactical mode:
By the end of move 24, in the following position, a forced mate (in 8) already exists for white
[FEN "2rq3r/1R6/p3kp1Q/4p3/2p1P1PP/P1N5/2P5/4KR2 w ...
First some background:
An 'input mechanism' is a tool to enact the moves you want to be played on a chessboard. The perfect input mechanism is probably "play whatever move I have in my mind immediately". But is this the fastest possible input mechanism? If you don't mind some perversion of the spirit of chess, you can get much faster: "play a ...
In bullet chess (1 min or less), you basically don't have time for thinking and will pre-move or make moves instantaneously often making assumptions about your opponent's moves. In such situation playing the best moves becomes less important; basically you just need to move fast without blundering too much. Playing chess at such short times becomes more ...
Just to show it's possible, here is a position, without the opponent king trapped at the edge of the board, where you can premove the entire sequence.
[FEN "8/6k1/4Q3/8/8/8/8/K7 w - - 0 1"]
Move the king to g5, play Qd7(+), and then continue as in Maxwell86's answer.
If you play on a tournament in http://lichess.org, you have the option to go into Berserk mode. This effectively halves your time (NOTE: not your opponent's), for the possibility of winning more points. If you're playing a 1 minute tournament, then berserking every game will allow you to effectively be playing 30 second games.
That being said, you won't ...
I've played in blitz tournaments where the higher rated player was handicapped 1 minute per 100 rating points with a maximum of 3 minutes deducted.
When you play with one 1 minute physical ability becomes a huge factor. If you are not fast enough to move a piece while your opponent is reaching for his clock, and then hit your clock near ...
Actually, ..Bb6 is a sound move not just in Blitz. The Italian and Scotch game are filled with it. There are plenty of reasons why you would make it:
After 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Nxd4 Bc5 5.Be3 White is threatening to win a piece, so Black can retreat to b6 and prevent his bishop from hanging.
Let's assume a central formation like e4+d3 vs e5+d6, ...
It's a trap.
You really try to reason too much about strategic aspects. This is a move that may not be considered sound in real chess... but we are talking about bullet here. And not Magnus Carlsen level bullet, which often almost looks like real chess, but Patzer level that more often than not is just bloody chaos.
Premoving is very common in bullet and ...
I've played one minute, no increment, over-the-board chess, it definitely can be done. My experience (at least with the opponents I've played with...) has been that it's almost always turned into a huge time scramble with lots of knocked-over pieces, and I can tell you that a substantial fraction of the games I've played at this time control (maybe 20% or ...
Well, of course in very short time controls one cannot assess all the details prescribed in the answers of that good post. Grandmasters rely mostly on their vast experience, as much as it happens in other fields. But we can say that pattern recognition for tactics and mate threats play a major role. And they also learn to polish their intuition. They can ...
Your question is interesting. I think I can share my experience because I am playing bullet for quite some time now. I used to use a touchscreen (Galaxy Tab S5E), but for the last couple of months, I am using a mouse.
Both of them have benefits as well as drawbacks to their side. The best benefit for the touchscreen is reachability with accuracy. You can ...
There are tons of first 4 moves that involve ridiculously unsound sacrifices, but most of these usually involve Bxf7+ and have no place in opening theory.
These 'openings' are largely based on a gross overvaluation of castling rights: you can just slowly castle by hand, especially since the attacker usually has no other pieces developed yet (e.g. after 1.e4 ...
Sometimes there's some practical value in taking a line others feel is unplayable and making it somewhat playable. At best, you should be aiming for a line that gives the opponent lots of chances to go wrong but allows you drawing chances if the opponent plays perfectly. I could give ideas but your opponent could be reading this too. It's best to come up ...
My friends and I used to play chess everyday before school started in high school. We were all more or less novices, knew the rules and nothing more, absolutely terrible lol. Our games were probably between a 3-0 and 5-0 min control. We didn't really measure the time we just knew we had between 25-30 mins to play a few games before classes started. I ...
These tricks work much better in bullet, where flagging is probably 50% of the game, than in blitz.
The obvious one is to reply to the start of a fianchetto by threatening the square the bishop is about to move to in case it was pre-moved. e.g. reply to g3 with Bh3. Of course if your opponent didn't pre-move and your bishop is unprotected then you lose a ...
They look at lots of master games and repeat those same patterns, avoiding blunders.
In the opening, every move is used to get a piece out.
In the middle game, piece maneuvering occurs.
In the end game, they move their kings and rooks to the strongest positions.
There's no shortcut to getting good.
Been there done that, done both.
You won't be much better than you can do OTB.
Most players will be a few hundred rating points lower.
Top GMs can play speed chess almost as good as they do OTB.
Most people play much worse.
How well you do at fast chess depends on how well you play.
You would do much better if you played at a fixed increment that you ...
That sacrifice could not have been countered once Re7+ was played, though on move 26 white could also have played Rb6+ since that would have won the black queen for free and is materialistically superior to Re7+.
Yes, there are several.
As stated by @B.Swan, you can search for "Andrew Tang Mouse Speed". Here are a couple videos that come up.
Another GM that comes to mind is Daniel Naroditsky, a well known chess streamer.
The first moves I look at, at any speed, are the checks.
Being human, under the pressure, I would play Qxf6+, as it also gains material (although it only leads to a draw). Qxc8+ also fits my criteria, but it moves the queen farther away, which just doesn't seem right.
The correct answer for the mate=in-two was aleady given but deleted by the post author.
Keeping the Bishop on that diagonal is very aggressive which is good in fast time controls.
Trading the bishop often gives the other side more control of the center and an open f-file.
By moving to b6 white will waste two moves and accomplish nothing where black now has a rook on an open file (which is a gain of time). Furthermore, the rook is a more ...