Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Questions relating to the objective assessment of a position. The assessment may entail which side has the advantage, or what the best move might be.
0
votes
1
answer
134
views
Why the analyzer propose this move?
My move was Kxc3. The move was labeled as a blunder. Why?
1
vote
1
answer
205
views
Why doesn't 1.fxe4 Nf6 work for black in this puzzle?
I was solving puzzles and I failed this one.
The correct answer was fxe4 fxe4 Bxh5+.
Why can the knight not just move to f6 and be safe there?
fxe4 Nf6 exd5 fxd5 is in my opinion more preferable for …
4
votes
2
answers
398
views
How to improve at chess by analyzing one's own games?
How can players avoid the pitfalls of self-analysis, such as being too harsh or lenient on oneself, or overlooking important mistakes? …
3
votes
4
answers
414
views
Why an analyser labels this move as a blunder?
On the picture, you see the move that was offered by the analyzer.
My move was Na5. Forking the Queen and the bishop, so I can negate white's attack on f7 and defending the undefended pawn b7, so the …
3
votes
4
answers
1k
views
Is a queen for two rooks reasonable in this position? What are the disadvantages?
Is Qxe8 reasonable?
I always wanted to trade off a queen against two rooks and the engine likes this idea, but am I leaving my pawns unprotected in this situation?
It would be hard to protect those …