1

This happens sometimes when you're playing a person, more often when playing the computer it seems. The lichess Android app for e.g., on the easiest setting, always follows Nc3 this way (usually following on the first variation below).

[FEN ""]
1. e4 e5 2. Nc3 Bb4 3. a3 ( 3... Bxc3 4. bxc3 Nf6 5. Rb1) (3... Ba5 4. b4 Bb6)  

Every time I see this played I wonder what black is trying to gain here. He either ends exchanging the bishop for my knight (and giving my rook a good open file) or locking his bishop in one corner, neither seems particularly useful.

Am I missing something?

1
  • ...Bb4 is indeed inaccurate in this position.
    – limits
    Jun 15 '15 at 22:10
4

It is indeed a little silly to play ...Bb4 on move 2 here. That said, it often gets played a little later, and the main idea is to pin the knight on c3 (after the d-pawn has moved), so that it no longer protects the pawn on e4, which can now be attacked by a knight on f6, say.

In the particular line you gave, by the way, the bishop is doing just fine on b6. You spent time kicking it to a place where it's aiming right at the weak pawn on f2 and beyond to your king on g1 once you castle.

1
  • Yes, that was pretty much the only advantage I could see as well, threatening the f2 square. But even with then black's dark bishop is in a precarious position. Wouldn't it make more sense to play Bc5 and then back up one more square a bit later?
    – Seth
    Jun 12 '15 at 0:16
3

This is an opening reminiscent of the Ruy Lopez. Black has several goals when playing 2... Bb4:

  1. Move the bishop out of the way in order to prepare to castle.

  2. Set up a potential knight-to-king pin, preventing white from advancing the important central d-pawn, which white will usually want to do in order to gain better control of the center.

  3. Attack the knight that is defending the e-pawn—this isn't as immediately productive as it is when played by white, as black has no way to subsequently capture it; however, it's still a threat.

  4. If black does trade the bishop for the knight, recapturing it will ruin white's pawn structure. Recapturing with the b-pawn is a bad idea (allowing 2... Bb4 3. a3 Bxc3 4. bxc3? d5 5. exd5 Qxd5 giving black better control of the center), and hence white is forced to move the important d-pawn aside.

3
  • 2. is pointless as it doesn't happen. 3. also seems pointless, you either exchange or are forced to back up in such a way that you aren't threatening it. It seems a bit early to be so sure 4. is a good idea. You don't even know what pawn structure white is going for! 1 seems to be the only useful gain (besides what dfan points out in his answer).
    – Seth
    Jun 12 '15 at 0:19
  • @Seth 2. does happen if white moves his d-pawn, which is usually a thing that white will want to do (in order to gain better control of the center). If black decides to trade the bishop, 3. leaves the e-pawn with nothing defending it (although white can easily fix that, which is why this (Bb4) isn't as good of a move as it is when played by white (Bb5 with a black knight on c6, i.e. the Ruy Lopez). For 4. trading the bishop forces white to recapture with the all-important d-pawn (as using the b-pawn allows 2... Bb4 3. a3 Bxc3 4. bxc3? d4 5. exd4 Qxd4 giving black better control of the center).
    – Doorknob
    Jun 12 '15 at 0:28
  • Whoops, sorry, those last three moves in my comment should be d5, not d4 (comment too old to edit).
    – Doorknob
    Jun 12 '15 at 0:34

This site is temporarily in read only mode and not accepting new answers.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .