4

Any good references (books/videos/tutorials) for this variation?

[fen ""]
[StartFlipped "1"]

1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 dxe4 4.Nxe4 Nf6 5.Nxf6+ gxf6

Thanks!

3
  • Yes there are, but I advise you not to play it. The plan with g3 + Bg2 offers White an advantage, if memory serves... Commented May 17, 2015 at 8:47
  • I actually prefer this variation to the "3. Nc3 dxe4 4. Nxe4 Bf5 5. Ng3" and "3. Nc3 dxe4 4. Nxe4 Nd7" variations. With the former, I am afraid to castle kingside because I could not stop White's kingside pawn storm and when castling queenside, I couldn't think of good plans for Black to play actively. With the latter, the game can be opened by white quickly. I am afraid of open games, I only like closed or semi-closed games, so the Bronstein-Larsen variation seems to be a semi-closed one. Commented May 18, 2015 at 0:27
  • 3. Nc3 dxe4 4. Nxe4 Bf5 5. Ng3 is quite solid, I would go that way. It offers easy equality, as far as I remember. Commented May 18, 2015 at 0:29

1 Answer 1

2

If you read Danish there's Bent Larsen's Solide åbninger (Solid openings) from 1980.

enter image description here

It is a repertoire book for beginners (white and black) and suggests the line you inquire about as the defense against 1. e4.

1
  • Thanks Dag Oskar Madsen, but unfortunately I don't read Danish. Commented May 18, 2015 at 0:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.