2

I am a very good attacking and tactical player. There is just one problem. While I catch combinations that might even require 5 or 6 moves, I cannot find 1 turn ones. Let's see this game I played today:

 [FEN ""]

 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 exd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 Nbd7 6. Bc4 Ne5 7. Bb3 Be7 8.
Bf4 O-O 9. Qd2 Ng6 10. Bg5 Re8 11. O-O-O c6 12. h4 d5 13. exd5 Nxd5 14. Bxe7
Ndxe7 15. h5 Ne5 16. h6 g6 17. Qf4 Nd5 18. Nxd5 cxd5 19. Nf3 Nxf3 20. Qxf3 Qg5+
21. Kb1 Bg4 22. Qc3 Qe5 23. Qxe5 Rxe5 24. Rxd5 Re2 25. Rhd1 Ree8 26. R1d4 Re1+
27. Rd1 Rxd1+ 28. Rxd1 Bxd1 29. f3 Be2 30. c4 b5 31. cxb5 Bxb5 32. Bd5 Rc8 33.
Be4 f5 34. Bc2 Kf7 35. a4 Rxc2 36. Kxc2 Bxa4+ 37. b3 Bb5 38. g4 f4 39. Kc3 Kf6
40. Kd4 Kg5 41. Ke4 Bc6+ *

I was white. This is the one I am presenting, but there are many games where I missed 1 turn tactics. Please help me.

  • Where is the "1 turn tactic" in this game? – JiK Nov 3 '14 at 8:08
  • It's the Re1+. Actually its more of an 2 turn one – MikhailTal Nov 3 '14 at 11:46
  • @MikhailTal: It's the Re1+. That is the consequence of psychological collapse you suffered from, after losing your advantage. The position has changed from "won for White" into "advantage for White". When you squander such an advantage, never "continue" to play. Take a break to calm down when you realize you lost the advantage and reassess the position. This is crucial to remember -> reassess only when calmed down. It seems to me like you kept playing "on inertia" for an attack while position required few "consolidating moves" from you in order to continue with your initiative... – AlwaysLearningNewStuff Nov 3 '14 at 13:12
13

It is a common problem to calculate all the variations and then suddenly realize that the first move was simply terrible. Actually, there is a rule that should be applied after finishing a complicated calculation, the Blumenfeld rule!

The Blumenfeld rule is formulated roughly as follows. After finishing a complicated calculation, take a fresh look at the position on the board. Try to picture the position directly after the next move you plan to make. Check whether you are missing something trivial. Are you perhaps losing a piece after this move? Are you missing a simple check that makes you lose material? Perhaps you will even be checkmated in a few moves? Only after completing this check for terrible blunders can you now go on and make your move.

This rule does not come easy to any player at any level!

  • 1
    Nice idea, and I thought his only chess idea is the Blumenfeld gambit :p – MikhailTal Nov 3 '14 at 18:46
  • One downvote? Why? – Rauan Sagit Nov 3 '14 at 19:09
  • 1
    I suspect the same person downvoted my answer ad OP's question as well... I really wish that person leaved a comment at least. The way things stand now, I suspect these were malicious downvotes but what can we do... – AlwaysLearningNewStuff Nov 3 '14 at 20:14
  • @AlwaysLearningNewStuff In my opinion, a comment or edit can help much more than a downvote. – Rauan Sagit Nov 3 '14 at 20:33
  • 1
    I reiterate: I think this was a malicious downvote, so the downvoter will never leave a comment nor retract it... – AlwaysLearningNewStuff Nov 3 '14 at 21:56
6

The answer is simple and cruel -> evaluation of the position. Unfortunately, being inactive for 10+ years, I suffer from the same problem so I know what I am talking about.

You will not find a winning move, nor winning lines, unless you evaluate that they are there in the position. That is why you miss those moves -> you didn't even consider that such possibilities exist in the position.

Can you answer me these questions:

  • How did you evaluate the position in the game, after your opponent played 17...Nd5 ?

  • Did you even consider 18.Bxd5 cxd5 19.Nxd5! since 19...Qxd5?? 20.Qf6 Nd3+! 21.Rxd3 Qe5 22.Re3! Qxf6 23.Rxe8# mates? Did you see this line, and if you did why did you dismissed it?

  • Why didn't you play 19.Bxd5! with the same mating tactic as above, instead of weak 19.Nf3 ?

What I am trying to say is that you didn't evaluate the position properly. Maybe you thought it was advantage for White ( +0.80 or something similar... ) while I believe it was won for White ( +1.60 at least ).

I strongly believe that you would have found these lines on your own if you thought you had a won position.

Solving tactical puzzles can fix this problem to some extent, but you really need to learn how to evaluate the position properly and this comes with experience. Reading books about typical middlegame positions helps as well, so does strong knowledge of endgames. These will help you in the beginning.

I advise you to start with tactical puzzles, and then move towards typical middlegame positions.

  • I was keeping the bishop to pressure f7, so I immediately dismissed it. – MikhailTal Nov 3 '14 at 8:02
  • @MikhailTal: I was keeping the bishop to pressure f7, so I immediately dismissed it. I knew it, it is the same thing that happens to me all the time. You had your plan and have decided to stick with it. That is why you missed the winning lines, because you didn't give other moves a chance. Have you evaluated properly that you get winning initiative after 18.Bxd5 you would have found the winning lines in no time and would play the move in a second. Unfortunately, there is no advice, other than I already gave you, for improving in the evaluation of the position. Better luck next time... – AlwaysLearningNewStuff Nov 3 '14 at 12:56
0

You missed at least TWO tactical chances.

On move 26, you made a very common mistake; you failed to realize that your king was smothered in your "back rank." If you had realized this, you would have moved your rook on d1 along the first rank, instead of "chasing" the bishop, and allowing what turned out be a deadly pin.

Many players play h3, or in this case, a3, as soon as possible, because of all the potential combinations that can arise from this pattern, which appears time and again. (You should have played a3 on move 25 before moving the rook to d1). I would guess that a lot of your "one move" faux pas arises from not knowing patterns like these. Learn them, and a lot of mistakes will go away.

You can see how your rook on d1 was "hobbled" by the insecurity of the king's position. The safety of the king is the first priority in chess.

As pointed out by Always Learning New Stuff, you also missed an opportunity on move 19 to play Bxd5, capturing the d pawn, and "forking" the knight and f pawn (the latter leads to mate). When Black defends the f pawn, you can capture the knight with B, thereby avoiding the "skewer" of your queen and rook by the Black bishop.

But the "back rank" problem is the more common one, which is why I answered it first.

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.