0

I want to see if a puzzle could exist where you must avoid finding mate in 1 or 2 but just find the mate in 3 solution.

This is not subjective it is a hard math problem to make a move that forces mate in 3 while avoiding other moves that force an earlier mate

2
  • 1
    Maybe you can express this more elegantly: a puzzle where there is a mate in 1, and mate in 2 & a mate in 3?
    – Laska
    Aug 5, 2023 at 4:28
  • Laska, Rewan, you simply could have linked to the relevant MatPlusForum thread :-) (Or do I misunderstand the intention of the author?) 8/3N1p2/8/2N2P2/p1Pk4/p2p1p2/B2PPPp1/6K1 HR, MPF May 10 2020 Aug 7, 2023 at 10:49

1 Answer 1

1
6k1/4Q3/6K1/8/8/8/8/8 w - - 0 1

Just take n moves, without threefold repetition, doing a king walk that goes back to g6 or h6. Then Qg7#. This will be your forced checkmate in n+1 moves.

EDIT:

k1B5/r2rrrrr/R7/R7/R1N5/R7/R6B/K7 w - - 0 2
2
  • the solution is far from unique, though. Aug 5, 2023 at 23:53
  • @NoamD.Elkies The new position I added should be a unique mate in three Aug 6, 2023 at 9:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.