Does a variant called 3-check, where you have to check the opponent 3 times to win, actually improve your train of thought and analysis of normal chess, or is it close enough to normal chess to actually help you?


1 Answer 1


According to me yes, 3-check does help you improve your normal chess to some extent.

Here's why:

  • You need to look for some long variations to see and prevent any further checks by the opponents.
  • Second is that you learn about king safety which is very important in normal chess. You learn not to expose your king in the game.
  • You learn some specific variations which might help you in gaining an advantage over your opponent in the opening. This is again similar to the normal variant of chess.
  • In order, to defeat your opponent you need to give 3 checks. To do that, you need to develop your pieces. This way, you learn to develop your pieces.
  • Plus, you need to defend very tightly if your king is open. This improves the defending skills of a player.

But playing a lot of 3-checks is usually not good for normal chess. By playing a lot, I mean you are not giving time to normal chess.

  • Normal variant requires studying endgames which is usually not seen in the 3-checks variant.
  • Normal chess requires studying/analyzing a lot of variations with the help of engines.
  • Normal chess usually doesn't end quickly if I talk about some high-level games.

The main reason why it probably improves your normal chess is that it's format is similar to that of normal chess unlike other variants like atomic.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.