4

Black (me) to move.

I took the knight at f3 with my knight at e1. However, Lichess analysis shows that this move is a blunder, and suggests to take the bishop at g2 instead.

IMO, I am winning no matter I exchange the knight or bishop, but I feel hard to understand why exchanging the knight f3 is a blunder?

[FEN "r1bq1rk1/pp3ppp/4p3/2Pp4/2P5/P1B2NP1/3NPPBP/R3nRK1 b - - 0 1"]

1...Nxf3? (1...Nxg2!)
5
  • 2
    A link to the lichess game might be useful. That said 1) I wouldn't worry too much, the difference in the captures is between very, very winning and very, very, very winning 2) That said I would have taken the bishop without thinking too hard - bishops are usually a little stronger than knights, especially when you possess the bishop pair, and given the choice I would always take the bishop unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, and here the white squared bishop is potentially about White's best piece.
    – Ian Bush
    Jan 15 at 13:07
  • 3
    Did Lichess actually say "blunder" or is that your interpretation?
    – user21820
    Jan 15 at 21:33
  • 1
    @user21820 This is a blunder considered by Lichess. Please see the link: lichess.org/GoIUYiwE/black#28.
    – null
    Jan 16 at 20:32
  • 1
    Thank you for the link; it seems that the Lichess SF engine used in that analysis had searched to a depth where it saw a way to reach much clearer winning position for Nxg2 than for Nxf3, and this yielded −6.7 instead of −3.2, which was significant enough that made it classify it as a blunder. From the engine's viewpoint, −6.7 is very much better than −3.2; although it will almost always win as Black given either, the likelihood that it will fail is much lower for −6.7 than −3.2.
    – user21820
    Jan 17 at 13:14
  • It's a matter of opinion whether you should consider it a blunder or not, because the bishop is really somewhat annoying. To understand the difference, simply try playing against maximum-level SF after Nxf3 (via Menu > Continue from here), and I would be interested to see the game that you end up with.
    – user21820
    Jan 17 at 13:25

1 Answer 1

5

why exchanging the knight f3 is a blunder?

It obviously isn't a blunder.

I suspect you've made the mistake of thinking that if the website tells you that it evaluates Nxf3 as fractionally lower than Nxg2 then that means that Nxf3 is a blunder. It isn't. A blunder is when your large positive advantage turns negative. A blunder loses you the game from a roughly equal position or throws away a winning advantage. It is not when the evaluation changes slightly against you.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.