BCLC guessed (see link) that even only 2P can win against Q, even if the Q side has the move, if they are advanced far enough. I quickly checked a few promising position candidates in a tablebase. He is correct, but even more, it is not even true that both pawns have to be on the 7th rank for that! Thus, a little challenge: Find the (at 1st look) unbelievable position where
- White has K+Q
- Black has K+P+P
- White has the move but is lost
- White is not in check
- One black pawn is only on the 5th row (from White).
Sidenote A: The position might be unique (I guess but I'm not 100% sure). Sidenote B: Due to 50 move rule, the win is longer than the simple shortest mate, but won it is.