5

Lichess's opening explorer database shows a 49% win rate for White wins compared to Black's 41% in the King's Indian, Exchange Variation. Meanwhile, the Master's database shows a whopping 64% draw rate, and a roughly even split of an 18% White win rate to 19% for Black. So, in a must-win situation, wouldn't it be better for Black to keep the tension for a move longer with 6... Nbd7, which avoids a queen trade after 7... e5?

[FEN ""]

1. c4 g6 2. Nf3 Bg7 3. Nc3 d6 4. d4 Nf6 5. e4 O-O 6. Be2 e5 (6... Nbd7) 7. dxe5 dxe5 8. Qxd8 Rxd8
8
  • I took the liberty of adding a diagram to show the opening. Please make sure I got it right and this is the variation you mean. – D M May 23 at 13:19
  • Do we talk about problems of must win situations or the kings indian defence? – user27863 May 23 at 15:51
  • 2
    Isn't 6...Nbd7 a perfectly valid move in the King's Indian Defence? – David May 23 at 19:26
  • @David I remember some time ago Khalifman disapproved it quite strongly. Not sure why though. – sleepy May 24 at 9:09
  • 2
    I guess it all comes down to the exact situation you're facing. Most of the time white doesn't really want to go for this line since it's not really that difficult for black to equalize, so generally speaking the KID tends to work well for the purpose of unbalancing the position from an early stage. – Scounged May 24 at 10:52
4

The first section of this answer is more subjective but I hope still insightful.

The KID isn't necessarily the best choice for a must-win game but it is a good choice for a fighting game and for creating chances to win as black. This is because it often creates a game where White will need to make many difficult choices and there are chances for White to go wrong. It's advantage over other openings is that it is more strategically complex and has less chances for simplification than solid mainlines. Yet is still more sound than extremely dubious lines such as the Budapest or Albin.

Now for a more objective analysis of the position you provided:

It is true that White has traded queens, but he has also traded his strong d4 pawn for Blacks d6 pawn. In this position Black is actually strategically better, the d4 square is forever weak and White is potentially overextended on the queenside. While Black can easily cover the d5 square with c7-c6. However it isn't so simple because black is also behind a lot in development. So we can understand that the position has become a dynamic fight between Whites initiative and development vs Blacks strategic advantage and control of the dark squares.

So to conclude: Yes the statistical draw rate is high, but Black is still getting a fight and it isn't easy for White. In general playing for win with black against a strong opponent is the most difficult task in chess and there is no perfect solution.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.