0

I never studied openings so decided to try it.My plan is to play e4 openings and Caro-kann for black. Now to learn the Caro-kann,I have to look at the Advance,exchange and Nc3/Nf6 stuff variations. After e4,if e5 I will play ruy lopez which also have variations like chigorin,breyer,exchange,etc. For french defense I would've to look at exchange,advance stuffs. This all seems like a hastle.I thought chess was a intuitive game,how can I memorise all these?,Any tips?

4
  • depends on your ambitions - if you want to become world champion - yes, otherwise understanding main ideas of opening is definitely enough to make 2400 FIDE, then it will become tough but still possible up to 2600; somewhere after that understanding alone does not work anymore - you will really have to know your lines.
    – Drako
    Apr 12 at 12:51
  • "otherwise understanding main ideas of opening is definitely enough to make 2400 FIDE"Don't give me so much hope man!,Do you know any resources that could help me with the understanding stuff?Like Mastering the chess openings by watson?
    – bretlee
    Apr 12 at 12:54
  • Books - read good books with commentaries and explanations; Some sessions with a trainer. Just get through some 1000-2000 miniatures (games under 20-25 moves), lot of books available as well and that will be completely enough to reach 2400 opening wise. You will obviously have to work on endgame and tactics as well.
    – Drako
    Apr 12 at 12:58
  • @Drako 1000-2000 miniatures is way more than you need. For some openings there aren't that many! Games that end up in an endgame are also important
    – David
    Apr 12 at 18:39
4

The answer depends on your strength. Unless you're a master, the answer is "no". Note that memorization of opening theory is easier the stronger of a player you are (as most moves will become "obvious", so you won't need to commit them to memory).

At this stage in your development as a chess player, the best thing you can probably do to help the study of openings is improving your chess skills (tactics and strategy).

But you can make the test yourself. Take a sample of your last few games and check how many of them would have had a different result if you knew by heart the lines you're about to study. The answer is probably "not many of them".

Ultimately it depends on what you want to achieve. If you want to master openings for the sake of mastering openings, then yes, you should memorize all of that. But odds are that what you're actually trying to improve is your overall chess strength, and there are definitely more effective ways to achieve that than rote memorization.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.