I am in the dark about the following endgame, with white to move. May someone with FinalGen (or a powerful engine) give me a response? Is it a White win or a draw?

[FEN "8/1k6/5R2/P7/1KP4p/5P2/8/5r2 w - - 0 1"]
  • Not sure this is such a useful question on a question/answer site like this. Why not just check yourself with Finalgen?
    – koedem
    Commented Jan 19, 2021 at 3:03
  • 1
    Unfortunately I do not have this instrument
    – Stefano
    Commented Jan 19, 2021 at 9:02
  • For what its worth, my Rybka checks, and then trades pawns, calling it 2.78 at about 33 depth.. which is pretty winnish, right? I dunno. I can't remember but I think I don't have the endgame tablebases installed, and I bet it would just know immediately if I did. Commented Jan 19, 2021 at 10:06
  • I guess I should specify, Rybka checks with Bc6... here: 1. Rb6+ Ka7 2. Rh6 Rxf3 3. Rxh4 Rf1 4. c5 Kb7 5. Kb5 Rb1+ 6. Rb4 Rg1 7. a6+ Ka7 ... still calling it 2.78 pawns ahead, at 34 depth Commented Jan 19, 2021 at 10:09
  • I think White has no better than trade f against h immediately (otherwise, Black gets the P for nothing, also a draw by Syzygy), and the resulting endgame a+c is usually draw. Thus it is easy to assign Justin's variant even with Nalimov: 3...Rf1? loses, only draw 3...Kb7. Commented Jan 19, 2021 at 10:18

2 Answers 2


Stockfish 14+ NNUE evaluates this position as +0.5 (depth = 62, 22036k nodes/s).

The principal variation (see below) leads to a theoretical draw according to the 7-piece tablebases.

[FEN "8/1k6/5R2/P7/1KP4p/5P2/8/5r2 w - - 0 1"]

1. Rf7+ Ka6 2. Rh7 Rxf3 {Theoretical Draw according to the 7-piece tablebases} (2. Rf6+ Kb7 3. f4 h3 4. Rb6+ Kc7 5. Rh6 Rxf4 {Theoretical Draw according to the 7-piece tablebases})

Other lines suggested:
From Justin Stafford's comment: 1. Rb6+ Ka7 2. Rh6 Rxf3 3. Rxh4 (theoretical draw)
From David's answer: 1. Rh6 Rxf3 (theoretical draw)


No need for engine analysis, that's a win for White since that parciular a+c pawn endgame is won. White can simply trade the other two pawns with Rh6

  • 7
    That's not true, Rh6 Rxf3 Rxh4 is a well known theoretical draw. Black defends this kind of position by putting the king on the short side (i.e. a file in this case) and then checks with the rook whenever the white king steps out from the c pawns cover.
    – koedem
    Commented Jan 19, 2021 at 10:46
  • @koedem Although the position after that line is a draw, Black must play exact. If Black took your advice literally and played Ka6, Ka7, or Ka8 the next move, White would have a forced win, according to the lichess tablebase.
    – D M
    Commented Jan 19, 2021 at 11:44
  • @DM yes, this was not a suggestion for specific moves, it is the general idea of how to hold this endgame. It is in fact quite difficult to defend / easy to screw up as a human.
    – koedem
    Commented Jan 19, 2021 at 12:56
  • OP has asked for theoretical status. 1. Rh6 Rxf3 is indeed a theoretical draw by the 7 piece tablebases. However, I also appreciate the practical considerations of playability, though the answer could be improved with more discussion for these considerations. Commented Nov 26, 2021 at 22:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.