5

When I was little (mid-late 90's) my mom taught me to play chess. She had a book, which looked pretty old at the time (perhaps from the 70s but I could be off by a decade or more). The book outlined the approach she used to teach me.

As the first step, she taught me only about the pawns. We played entire games with ONLY the pawns. Each player had eight pawns set up on their second row (the same positions as in normal chess), and the pawns moved exactly as in chess, including capturing en passant when legal. The object of this game was to either get a pawn to the other side of the board, or to capture all the opponent's pieces. This was a great game and a great introduction and was very easy to learn and remember.

My trouble is, I don't recall what the next step was. It may have been to introduce rooks and play the same game but with rooks added. That rings a bell, but I'm not sure.

I'm now teaching my 7-year-old son to play chess, and I'd love to be able to use the same approach I learned with as I know it was successful although I don't remember the rest of the details of the gradual approach. (My mother passed away a couple years ago so isn't available to ask about it.)

Does anyone recognize this approach? Does it have a name? Is there a book (either a well known book or an obscure one) that uses this method as the first step toward teaching chess to a beginner? (The book may have been giving an approach specifically for teaching children, or just a general method of teaching chess, I'm not sure.)

  • fortunately I never saw that book. there are better ways to learn. – edwina oliver Aug 19 at 1:17
  • 2
    @edwinaoliver For adults maybe. But when teaching children, the most important thing by far is to make things fun and hopefully spark some longer-lasting interest from that. Not hitting the child with the full complexity of chess at once (without bending the rules! It's just starting with pawn endgames, basically) sounds like a very sensible idea. – Annatar Aug 19 at 8:37
  • 1
    If you think about it, this is the same way we teach subjects at school: You start adding numbers from 1 to 10, then to 20, then to 100, and so on, long before learning stuff like linear algrebra. – Annatar Aug 19 at 8:39
4

You can make it up yourself as you go along. You already know that chess is better learned with as few pieces on the board as possible, which puts you way ahead of the people who want to teach newcomers with all 32 units.

At the first meeting of a 10- or 12-week class, I teach the kids a game with eight white pawns and the black queen. If a pawn reaches the 8th rank (unlike chess, it doesn't have to survive the 'promotion'), the pawns win. If the queen gobbles all the pawns or blocks the last pawn remaining, the queen wins.

Some kids never get past that, but they get to enjoy the play time instead of struggling with chess, and the great thing about it is that it's an equalizer. I lose some of those games, and unlike chess, when I talk about why I'm making this move or that, the kids understand.

| improve this answer | |
  • That's a good suggestion, I'll try that game (8 pawns vs. 1 queen). Still hopeful to find the book I mentioned, but at least this gives me another step to do with my son. – Wildcard Aug 19 at 21:43
  • 1
    That game's quite similar to an actual chess variant in fact- Horde can be played on lichess. – pulsar512b Aug 20 at 15:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.