6

On the board, there are 2 queens (of the same color) placed on random squares. The opposing side has only a king, placed on a random square (and not in check). There obviously exists a mating sequence. What is the biggest possible 'n' such that there is a forced Mate in 'n'? In other words, given the above situation, what is the upper bound on the minimum number of moves required to give a checkmate?

4
  • I don't have an answer to your question but I have a comment that may be relevant to your research. This link has mate in 2 puzzles with two queens vs a lone king: apronus.com/chess/puzzles/mate-in-2/?KQQvK Aug 9 '20 at 10:37
  • 1
    "There obviously exists a mating sequence." Except for stalemates. Aug 9 '20 at 12:41
  • 1
    @TheSimpliFire The solution to that is not to stalemate.
    – Unfair-Ban
    Aug 10 '20 at 1:58
  • 3
    @You'rebadandshouldfeelbad I think the stalemate comment was intended to point out the possibility that the "random" starting position in the question might be stalemate. Aug 11 '20 at 3:54
14

The longest KQQ-K mate whilst maintaining optimality is a mate in 4.

[FEN "8/8/8/3k4/8/5K2/8/4Q2Q w - - 0 1"]
3
  • 1
    Wouldn't 1... Kd4 give one more movement to the black?
    – fedorqui
    Aug 10 '20 at 7:35
  • 3
    @fedorqui, in that case, 2. Qc7 (Kd5 3. Qe4#) (Kd3 3. Qe3#) mate in 3.
    – justhalf
    Aug 10 '20 at 8:07
  • Yes, this seems right. I played a lot in an analysis board and couldn't find a position which requires mate in 5. Nov 12 at 16:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.