5

Here is a short game played online at chess.com.

[FEN ""]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 d6 5. d4 Bb6 6. dxe5

Black resigned for some unknown reason; maybe a mouse slip or he/she needs to leave. When the game was analysed at chess.com, the game accuracy of white is 99.7%. In my humble opinion, every White move is accurate (unless one considers 3. Bb5 to be more accurate than 3. Bc4). But why is the game accuracy for white is not 100%? What is the 0.3% that White l missed?

Improve this question
7
  • 1
    Can you show which entity did the analysis that got 99.7% accuracy? (a link to the analysis would be best)
    – Allure
    Aug 3, 2020 at 7:06
  • 6
    After reading only the title, I thought this is a Breaking Bad question.
    – Shadov
    Aug 3, 2020 at 11:12
  • 1
    @Shadov what would be the breaking bad connection?
    – pulsar512b
    Aug 3, 2020 at 15:39
  • 2
    @pulsar512b: The main character's name is Walter White. IDK what Shadov had in mind for accuracy; possibly mixing chemicals (something the character was excellent at).
    – Peter Cordes
    Aug 3, 2020 at 15:49
  • 1
    @pulsar512b As above. About accuracy - it's a big thing in the show that Walter White's meth purity is, if I remember correctly, 99.1%. That is the main reason he becomes so successful - it's a lot better than the regular street-meth.
    – Shadov
    Aug 3, 2020 at 18:32

3 Answers 3

Reset to default
19

Probably, as you pointed out, Bb5 instead of Bc4.

The Ruy Lopez is considered very very marginally better/more critical than the Italian by humans, so it'd make sense that the engine used here'd agree.

Certainly, however, the Italian is fine, and the difference is very marginal.

Improve this answer
9
  • 7
    Running the moves on chess.com/analysis we see that all white’s moves match the engine’s top move except 3. Bc4. It seems reasonable to assume that the engine used to give an accuracy score is the same as the one they use for their analysis board.
    – DongKy
    Aug 2, 2020 at 2:49
  • 1
    Thank you for the answer! Talking about be very marginal accuracies, after 1. e4, is e5 very marginally better than c5 or c6 or e6?
    – Zuriel
    Aug 2, 2020 at 3:01
  • 3
    e5 is (probably) very marginally better than e6 and c6, but it's not so clear for c5.
    – pulsar512b
    Aug 2, 2020 at 4:18
  • 1
    Stockfish actually has a thing for the French.
    – David Miedema
    Aug 3, 2020 at 22:46
  • Apparently, the best move for Black against 1.e4 is 1...e6.
    – user24344
    Aug 12, 2020 at 4:03
6

Well, we can trust the engine in some cases when they analyse, but in this case, we are looking at book moves. Since the Italian Game is perfectly reasonable, don't worry about the 0.3% off.

Improve this answer
1
  • 1
    Not all book moves are best.
    – edwina oliver
    Aug 3, 2020 at 20:44
1

Assuming the engine performing the analysis is Stockfish (sounds reasonable, since the engine is presumably running on CPU) then it's probable the move it considers subpar is 4.c3. Left to its own devices Stockfish will occasionally play the Giuoco Piano, but it will usually play the Giuoco Pianissimo - i.e. 4.d3 instead of 4.c3.

Indeed, the cloud analysis by Stockfish 11 at lichess.org/analysis gives, at depth 45, +0.3 for 4.d3 compared to +0.2 for 4.c3. You can also check out the SF-Lc0 bookless bonus TCEC ran in 2019. There were ten Italian games, all played by Stockfish, and of these games 9/10 continued with 4.d3.

Improve this answer
1
  • But 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 d6 5. d4 Bb6 gives a score of 100%. So it doesn't seem like 4.c3 is the culprit.
    – D M
    May 24, 2021 at 9:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.