2

I am a beginner player and I am studying the game on some classical books: I began with "A primer of chess" by Capablanca. I would like to continue with these 3 books:

  • "Chess Fundamentals" (Capablanca)
  • "My System" (Nimzowitsch)
  • "Hypermodern chess" (Alekhine)

In which order would you suggest to study these books? Could you also suggest to me something else to study?

  • 1
    First, note that your request for a suggested reading order of those 3 books is asking for opinions. Opinion based questions are not allowed. Second, in the top left hand corner of the screen, next to where it says "StackExchange", it says "Search on Chess". Click there, enter "books", hit return and you will get a long list of questions about books. Many of the answers will include useful suggestions of books to read. – Brian Towers Jul 24 at 23:16
  • What does beginner mean in this context? Based on your post I guess that you're considering yourself as an 'advanced beginner', meaning that your visualization is starting to get to the point where you're able to spot hanging pieces without much effort and you've been able to master the basic mates involving heavy pieces. Note, however, that this is very different from a complete beginner, who will be struggling with these things. – Scounged Jul 24 at 23:33
  • Deinitely not "hypermodern chess", it's not meant to be for beginners – David Jul 26 at 15:08
4

Capa's books are very good for your level especially the one you mentioned.

My System is probably too advanced for where you're at. It's a great book but probably better for someone around 1800. Beginners should focus on not making huge tactical mistakes. Positional play like My System teaches you how to plan what to do when you can play a game without making huge mistakes.

I don't know the other one but judging by the title I would say it's way too advanced. You won't be able to understand hypermodern chess until you have a crystal clear understanding of classical centers. Few players below 1800 have any clue what they're doing in the center.

As far what I would recommend-

I really like the book Learn Chess: A Complete Course by C. H. O'D. Alexander. I admit the book can be a little hard to read but it covers every aspect of the game and includes hundreds of tactical puzzles. The chapters on attacking are the best I've seen outside of Vukovic and are targeted towards beginner players.

Silman's Complete Endgame Course: Yes, it's an endgame book but you will learn exactly what you need to know for the level you're at. Endgames are also good for beginners because you break the game down into smaller parts and learn to use the pieces individually.

How to Play Good Opening Moves by Mednis- The book is small but i promise you you can reach 2000 without knowing anything more about the opening than what's in that book. Center, development, king safety. That's all you need to know.

Any tactics book. If you do tactics problems you will get better. Probably the book that will give you the most "bang for your buck" is How to Beat Your Dad at Chess. The tactics are common and the section on facing a strong opponent is good advice.

I'll add one more and that's Rapid Chess Improvement by de la Maza. You can buy the book if you want but the book was based on a couple of articles written by de la maza which are still freely available on the internet (search 400 points in 400 days .pdf etc) Most of the rest of the actual book is testimonials and maybe a little elaboration in some areas. Basically, de la Maza argues that you need to study tactics and develop an effective thinking process to improve from beginner to intermediate. You won't find a strong player anywhere who disagrees with that even if they don't like de la Maza.

| improve this answer | |
  • Thank your for your answer..actually it is true that I make too many blunders and I need first to learn how to analyze better the position...I will keep nimzowitsch and Alekhine for the future..I will continue with capablanca and learn chess of Alexander then the others you suggested – Christian_g3k0 Jul 26 at 1:00
2

There are so many definitions of “beginner” :-) So i can only try some general advices.

Beginners should start with tactics and easy endgames. In Europe, the Stappen method is quite popular and has a lot of materials for beginners and intermediates, but any book with explanation of tactical motives and a LOT of examples will serve. An app with chess puzzles is also a good idea. For endgames, i heard a lot of recommendations of Silman’s Complete Endgame Course. If you can read german, Bernd Rosen “Fit am Endspiel” is a very good start. Some beginners regard the endgame as dull, but it is where you learn about the very nature of your pieces. Serious work at those points will bring you to 1400–1600.

In strategy, “Mein System” is the basis of positional thinking. I also recommend Jeremy Silman “How to reassess your chess“.

The classic books have a lot of value. But you should be aware that chess has evolved since. Some opening systems that have been favorits for Alekhine or Capablanca are considered faulty today. Get the ideas of the game, enjoy their beauty, but always remember: they might be wrong.

With understanding strategy, you might reach 2000.

To improve further, you will have to deal with openings. It really is not necessary to do it earlier. Don’t bother with books. Look at some good videos. I learned a lot at chess24, and there will be others.

| improve this answer | |
  • I didn't know the Stappen method, interesting. I also watch videos on youtube and train with puzzles on the main chess websites. Videos helped me to avoid the most common traps that beginners like to play, unfortunately in general I can't memorize many sequences of moves so I prefer to study the principles of the game on books, I think this helps to recognize common patterns. – Christian_g3k0 Jul 26 at 11:56
  • @Christian_g3k0 you learn patterns by studying the patterns. Assorted tactical puzzles. It is not about memorizing move sequences, but in deed about pattern recognization and stratagems. You will learn the older ones by classical games. – Christian H. Kuhn Jul 28 at 14:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.