I am about to play a master. This is an important game, and I want to win it. What should I do and how to prepare? Is there something special I can do, such as special openings, sharp lines, etc.?

  • 14
    What ratings are we talking about? Feb 20 '20 at 20:34
  • 2
    @user1583209 This is Slobo's FIDE profile (from another question): ratings.fide.com/profile/987751 Rating 1542 (as of last report of course)
    – Joe
    Feb 21 '20 at 18:49
  • 1
    For what it’s worth, anything is possible. I won a game when I was fifteen against our high school chess coach.
    – WGroleau
    Feb 22 '20 at 2:13
  • 6
    On the bright side, you both start with 8 pieces and 8 pawns. It's not like a fantasy game where one player has the biggest baddest sword and armor and the other has barely passable gear.
    – corsiKa
    Feb 23 '20 at 1:32
  • I was going to play with IM ( and FM ) but it suddenly cancelled. Feb 23 '20 at 18:49

Unless you have gotten much stronger than your 1542 FIDE rating, you have to realize that your odds of winning are not very good. It is fine to be realistic, but just do not let that overwhelm your emotions.

You want to keep calm, and do not be afraid. I would not be afraid at all if I were playing Magnus Carlsen. Oh sure, I know what the result is likely to be as I am not crazy, but there is no point in having any fear, and I would just try to play the best chess I can.

It helps if you are white, but if possible, I would aim for a position where I can reasonably gambit a pawn, or two, for a wild tactical position. If you play a quiet position where your master opponent's stronger positional skill is not challenged, you are destined to lose. On the other hand, even low-level masters can make tactical errors, and over look something.

If you have a lot of time to prepare for him, like in a one-game-per-week tournament, go over every game of his you can get your hands on with a computer. It is not likely, but you might find some opening move that he has played that is a hidden blunder, and if so, you could aim for that position again.

Although rare, lightening does strike. Here is a game that I still recal reading during my first year of playing. This is from the 1980 U.S. Open, and a 1621 player, W Stanley Davis, beat GM John Fedorowicz, who was rated 2479 at the time, so good luck. Please note that it was an aggressive, tactical game.

This is from the December 1980 issue of Chess Life, and I took it from the free archives the USCF now puts out online.

enter image description here

  • 14
    @edwinaoliver If you play a slow, quiet, positional game against someone, who understands chess a lot better than you, that is almost guaranteed to lose. I am not saying just throw away pawns, but be willing to sacrifice them if reasonably possible to set the game on a sharp tone, especially where the stronger opponent has more chance to go wrong. Feb 21 '20 at 0:26
  • 9
    But you have a shot. The other way, you are all but guaranteed to lose. What difference does it make as to how fast? A loss is a loss. Feb 21 '20 at 2:26
  • 10
    My 40 years of playing, 35 as a Master crushing people who would follow your advice, say differently. If I know A LOT more about position than someone, their only chance is in complications where I might miss something. In quiet, positional, games, I probably don't need to analyze more than 2-3 moves deep...it is all feel. My feel is better. Feb 21 '20 at 14:01
  • 9
    You are missing the point: They are likely to lose no matter what, but the ONLY chance the weaker player has is if the Master gets lost somehow.... that will never happen in a purely positional game. Please, I showed a game that proved my point. I will gladly concede if you can show me a game that a Master was positionally outplayed by a much weaker player. Feb 21 '20 at 14:23
  • 9
    No, you can lose that way too, and should most of the time, but as a reasonably strong player myself, I can tell you that we do miss tactics A LOT more than making bad positional moves. The chances are just better, even if they are just a "puncher's chance". Feb 21 '20 at 17:20

Objectively speaking there is nothing special you can do.

Just do the regular preparation:

  • refresh your opening repertoires or specifically the opening you expect to have on the board
  • analyze your opponent's playing style and if possible play so as to avoid their strengths (e.g. play open tactical position if you see that your opponent prefers closed positions)
  • do regular tactics training etc.
  • eat healthy food, go to bed early, do some sports
  • play as good as you can...

If the opponent is much much stronger, don't expect too much. You are not going to do wonders by just a preparation.

If you like to gamble, you could prepare a non-standard side-line opening which might surprise your opponent and if you are lucky, you might get an advantage. Still that's risky as typically those openings are somewhat unsound if your opponent knows what they are doing.


In his book "Chess for Tigers", Simon Webb says that the best thing to do is to drag the elephant into the swamp. In other words, aim for complications, where the stronger player has a chance to make a mistake.

In a similar vein, a local player wrote an article about his rise in rating, and his advice was to make the stronger player beat you.

Both of these methods have worked for me to upset stronger players.

  • the weaker player would have a far greater chance of making a mistake if they complicated the game Feb 21 '20 at 15:52
  • What does "make the stronger player beat you" mean?
    – Jontia
    Feb 21 '20 at 16:03
  • 2
    @Jontia just that. Make them earn the win over the board. Do the best that you can, whether you are defending a tough position, attacking or counter-attacking.
    – Herb
    Feb 21 '20 at 16:29
  • @Jontia I imagine he means that whatever aggressive strategy you could theoretically use, not only will the master defend effectively, but you are more likely to make a mistake and be at a disadvantage. Likewise, the master is more likely to make a mistake probing a solid defence rather than handling a mid-tier attack. "Make the stronger player beat you" - rather than hand them the win due to aggressive mistakes. At least... that's what I think he's saying
    – James
    Feb 21 '20 at 16:30

Exactly how you'd play any other game. Adjusting from the strongest elements of your game (that is: the ones that you play normally) will only make you play worse than your rating, reducing your chances of winning.


It depends how good you are.
Are you a near master? Are you much weaker? If the player is much stronger you need to play for the draw and make him take chances which cause him to lose.

If you know the master and he always uses certain openings then for sure brush up on those and what defenses/attacks you might use.

If you know what his style is then you can try for openings that deny him his natural advantage.

If you know his personality you might be able to find a way to throw him off his game with things off the board.

Get a good nights sleep. Do not worry about the game.
Relax and play your best to maximise your chances.

There is no guarantee that you will beat anybody. Just play your best and play solid not taking stupid chances. Go into the game being willing to take a draw.
But IF the opportunity arises then be willing to go for the win.

Fischer played to win every game from the first move. For more ordinary players that style is way too risky. Especially if you are playing someone much better than you.

  • 3
    The mindset of "playing for a draw" is a dangerous one though, psychologically. The safest move is not always the best. Many times, only a counterattack keeps the equilibrium, while turtling leads to slow suffocation.
    – Annatar
    Feb 21 '20 at 13:19
  • obviously it depends on the position. but playing solid and safe is better for beating a good player than trying to outtactics them with some ill conceived attack Feb 21 '20 at 13:48

These two general strategies might be effective:

  1. Get into a tactical melee. In a slow positional game where the 2nd-best move is only a little worse than the best move, you're practically bound to lose. But if you get into a sharp position where a blunder is fatal, and opponent blunders first, you can still win.

  2. Scorched earth policy hoping to get into a very drawish position while exchanging everything. If opponent is much better than you, they might feel pressured to win, and if the position simply doesn't allow for it then they might overpress and lose.

That said, since they are much stronger than you, you should expect to lose.

  • 3
    I didn't downvote, but I question option 2. a strong player will only allow trades on favorable terms, and the OP can, without realizing it, end up trading down into an endgame that is trivially won for the master.
    – Akavall
    Feb 21 '20 at 5:39
  • 4
    I agree with @Akavall . Even if you somehow manage to get into a theoretically dead equal endgame, chances are that the master's endgame technique is much better than yours and you still lose. "All rook endings are drawn", yet I have never seen a rook endgame between players with a 500+ elo difference actually end in a draw.
    – Annatar
    Feb 21 '20 at 7:07
  • 2
    It works though, at least at higher levels - e.g. Karjakin's win against Carlsen in their WCC match arose because Carlsen overpressed. In an amateur against master game, I agree, it might not work.
    – Allure
    Feb 21 '20 at 7:31
  • @Allure Carlsen and Karjakin were not separated by hundreds of rating points though. I do agree that it is a viable strategy if you are just slightly disadvantaged.
    – Annatar
    Feb 24 '20 at 7:03

Play aggressively and in positions you're comfortable with. They expect you to play passively and those are easy wins for them.

In most situations you would steer towards tactics over position. Tactical ability peaks fairly young while positional knowledge tends to grow over time. A master is most likely going to be past his tactical peak and relying more on his positional play. It would be almost unheard of for a player like you to beat a master positionally but it's always possible they could make a tactical mistake.

If you have examples of their games you can prep lines using an engine. However, you should make sure you know what you're doing. Don't play a line just because an engine or book says it's good.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.