6

I'm writing a PGN file parser, and need to know in which situations you don't need to write the rank/file of a piece that makes the move. I can think of the following:

  • only one piece can conduct the move according to the rules of movement (i.e. attempting to move a bishop horizontally - that's obvious).

  • both pieces can move to the given square, but all but one are obstructed by other pieces

  • all but one of the pieces are pinned and moving them would expose the king to check

Anything else I'm missing?

I'd also like to add some seemingly ambiguous situations:

Position #1

Black to move. Is Nc5+ valid PGN, or would it be Nbc5+? Is Nc5 valid, or would it be Nec5?

Position #2

Black to move. Is Rg7# / Rg7+ valid PGN, or do I need to specify the rank here?

What if two pieces can move to the same square, but one of the moves would result in threefold repetition, and the game doesn't stop instantly?

What if two pieces can move to the same square, one of those moves forces a mate-in-one on the moving side, and the move is labeled "!!"? :)

8
+50

From the PGN specification (http://www6.chessclub.com/help/PGN-spec):

Neither the appearance nor the absence of either a check or checkmating indicator is used for disambiguation purposes. This means that if two (or more) pieces of the same type can move to the same square the differences in checking status of the moves does not allieviate the need for the standard rank and file disabiguation described above. (Note that a difference in checking status for the above may occur only in the case of a discovered check.)

This means you have to specify files respectively ranks in your two diagram examples.

My understanding is that you need to disambiguate in the last two situations you describe as well.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.