-3

Sam Loyd, 1860

[fen "8/8/8/8/B6n/7p/6k1/4K3 w - - 0 1"]

1.Bd7!! h2 2.Bc6 Kg1 3.Bh1!! Kxh1 4.Kf2.

(Ke1, Ba4; Kg2, Nh4, h3) says mate in 54 after 1.Bd7!! h2 2.Bc6 Kg1 3.Bh1!! Kxh1 4.Kf2.

This is a textbook draw, as the king is on the same square as the knight (with Black to move). For example, in some moment 1...Nf4+ 2.Kf1 Ng3+ 3.Kf2 Ne2 4.Kf1. (No. 205, BCE. Fine.)

Mate in 54? What's up with that?

enter image description here

3
  • 2
    Why is the knight on a different square, and where is it saying mate in 54?
    – Herb
    Apr 15 '19 at 21:12
  • Stockfish returns a draw score in both your screenshot and the original game pgn.
    – konsolas
    Apr 15 '19 at 22:22
  • 1
    Its only mate when the analysis evaluation is prefixed with a #, as in #3 for white or #-3 for black
    – Isac
    Apr 16 '19 at 10:03
4

Stockfish 10 of lichess @ depth 74 says it's draw. Only if you can give more details about the version of Stockfish you used

enter image description here

2
  • See edit, please. Apr 15 '19 at 18:57
  • I agree with Intertial Ignorance answer in this case. Stockfish just couldn't find a forced win so he do a simple material comparaison and by the looks of it, black is completely winning. If you try to follow to main lines you'll see that it never shows in # (mate) in x moves always a material advantage.
    – MrMaxPayne
    Apr 16 '19 at 8:14
2

Mmm that's not mate in 54, just a -52.40 evaluation (equivalent of being "52.4 pawns" down).

The engine is calculating far ahead and can't find a forced win, but sees Black's up a pawn and knight so it evaluates based off that. I'm surprised the engine wasn't smart enough to evaluate as a draw though, especially if you're using current Stockfish?

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.