3

62...g5?

I (a 2300 player) would never consider 62...g5 in this position giving White a protected passed pawn. Nakamura either thought it was a drawing method, or the toughest defense, but Carlsen showed there is a clear winning plan for White. 62...g5 strikes me as a clear mistake but are other moves easier for White to win against?

I am trying to understand this decision by a 2800 player, thanks.

1

Let's say that Naka doesn't push g5 and instead waits (with for instance Rb7). Then it is white who can play g5+, taking advantage of the pin on the 6th rank. If black plays Kg6, then Kg4 and h5+ is unstoppable. It is clear that white is making progress. If black instead plays Kh5, then gxf6 hxf6, Rxf6 and black has lost a pawn and his king is completely stuck in a box. Rf5+ might be a possibility (taking on e5), black still cannot move the a pawn (due to an immediate Ra6 getting behind it), and again white has clearly made progress.

I believe Naka was sure that these lines were easy wins for white. Better to make the committal, but potentially holdable, g5 move, and try and hold the position with a static pawn structure, than sit and wait only to lose in a few moves.

  • 62...Kh7 63.g5 fg5 64.hg5 Re7 is another option. Sure White continues to squeeze but these lines appear to be unclear still while g5 is a clear loss I believe. Did Naka just not know this ending? – Ywapom Aug 30 '18 at 17:21
  • g5 not a "clear" loss if you believe you can stop white from penetrating. If so, this ending could be transformed into a philidor position. Unfortunately, you cannot stop an eventual king penetration... – NoseKnowsAll Aug 30 '18 at 19:52
  • This is definitely the why of nakamuras decision – Hockeyfan19 Sep 9 '18 at 4:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.