-1

I have not been able to tell why my computer sometimes tell me that advancing a pawn from its original square in order to kick an opponent piece is right and other times wrong. Take for instance, this game whose link is in case someone needs it: https://lichess.org/JdqqGV0Aekw4 enter image description here

In this case it is Ok to play a6 to kick out the knight. However, in this position:enter image description here I played the obvious Nf3. However, it seems that kicking out the bishop with a3 would be a great mistake. I feel that sometimes kicking out these annoying pieces gets me in a less superior position whereas other times it is best kicking them out before castling or proceeding with the development of pieces and that is something that really confuses me. I would appreciate if someone could really give some kind of rule of thumb or at least some things to consider before doing those pawns advances.

  • There's a slight discrepancy between your title (about attacking a piece on the 6th or 3rd rank) and the examples in the body of your question (about attacking a bishop on the 4th or 5th rank). – bof Jul 23 '18 at 20:12
  • Sorry about that. I will correct that. As for a3, the computer gives me a minimum advantage whereas moving Nc3 gives an advantage greater than +1. – Maths64 Jul 23 '18 at 22:04
  • Sorry I meant Nf3 in my last comment – Maths64 Jul 23 '18 at 22:28
2

Nf3 protects the pawn on d4, which otherwise will be taken by queen during the next move.

5

In the second example, after a2-a3, black does not have to retreat his dark squared bishop but can instead play ...Qxd4 when after axb4 Black can follow up with Qxd3.

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.