3

Are there any annotations on the obscure Mighty Thor Gambit?

[FEN ""]
1.e4 e6 2.a3 d5 3.e5 c5 4.b4 

(which is different from The Wing Gambit:)

[FEN ""]
1.e4 e6 2.Nf3 d5 3.e5 c5 4.b4

At a tournament where it was played numerous players referred to it as "The Mighty Thor Gambit" but I've not seen that mentioned anywhere online.

  • But it is not the wing gambit. The move order is distinct and the resulting positions quite different. – Ywapom Oct 26 '17 at 0:35
  • My book doesn't even know 2.a3 so I guess it's just worse version of the more serious 2.Nf3 followed by 4.b4. I always say about such a moves that they are over flexible, you don't know, which piece will go where, so you leave them in starting position and move with wing pawns... – hoacin Oct 26 '17 at 7:48
  • A main difference between it and the Wing gambit is that White doesn't commit the Knight to f3 and can therefore play f4. – Ywapom Oct 26 '17 at 15:15
  • 1
    What tournament was it played at? Who played it? That might provide some useful context. – Dennis Oct 28 '17 at 1:32
  • It was in a USATW so not a GM game, but I have found a few examples on chesstempo – Ywapom Oct 28 '17 at 1:47
1

I am not aware of any published analysis nor commented games in this line.

Note that Black can almost forcefully transpose into a 'regular' wing gambit with 4...Nc6 5.Nf3 [5.f4, 5.bc5, and 5.Bb2 cb4 all look worse] cb4.

In case he is looking for more original play, 4...d4, 4/5...Qb6, 4/5...Qc7 all look interesting and try to demonstrate that a3 might not be the most useful move for White when Black refrains from taking on b4.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.