3

Andersson gives Karpov two tempi (Na6-b4-a6-b4). Understandably, he moved his knight to b4 initially to attack the white bishop. But then he moved it back and forth! It was the 32nd move when he did this, so it is possible that it was due to time. Is there a subtler intention?

2

Na6-b4-a6-b4 was a waiting strategy. Black lacked counterplay in the position, and there wasn't much else to do. ...Nxf3+ was a possibility but it would just open the g-file for White's rook.

| improve this answer | |
  • Why didn't he just exchange his light-squared bishop with the g6 knight, making it more difficult for white to break into the kingside? – Jossie Calderon May 16 '17 at 17:16
0

In "Anatoly Karpov: My 300 Best Games" Karpov gives 31...Nb4?! as a dubious move, and suggests 31...Rb4 instead, with the clear idea that Bxb4 cxb4 and Nc5 gives black a bind on the queenside.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.