3

So far I used UCI only to make analysis of particular positions, sending FEN, showing multipv, analysing fixed depth/time, clearing hash for every next position.

Now I would like to make the same engine play against itself a blitz game and I guess this approach might waste a lot of CPU resources. Any information on this topic, ideally with example of UCI communication included, will be appreciated. Especially I want to ask:

How should I setup hash and when should I clear it? After each move, after reaching certain amount of nodes searched from last clearing to defend against hash colisions?

Is there a better way than sending FEN after each move to UCI?

Should I setup multipv to 1 and always wait for "bestmove"?

I'm not very concerned by slowdowns caused by fen parsing etc, but I would like not to make some huge mistake like clearing knowledge made on previous moves. Of course I want engine being able to reuse as much calculations as possible for both sides from last moves.

1

I don't think it's a good idea to write a new framework. You should use Cutechess. CuteChess is free, stable, fast and reliable.

I'll answer your questions anyway:

  • You should not clear the hash, it's the engine job to fill it and replace it
  • You don't have to send FEN, you can also give a move list
  • By default, multipv is 1 so you don't need to do anything

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.