4

We play with the rule one loses -> the team loses. My cheesy titled question is serious: let's try to wrap our heads around the Bughouse clock mechanics. When should one consider sitting/stalling? I imagine these ones:

  • I sit because the opponent mates me in the next move.

  • Because moving would mean giving my opponent a chance to capture a piece of mine, giving his partner a piece he needs and improves his game a lot.

  • To wait for a piece my opponent could handle me that could give me huge advantage.

Also, for stalling/sitting we always need more time that the diagonal opponent, if not, he could stall and we lose by time.

Are there other reasons to sit/stall?

  • 1
    I'm not specialist but once played against and they were stalling even with worse time, starting to play at around 10 seconds against our 20 and won on time :-) – hoacin Jan 5 '17 at 8:05
  • @hoacin lol! funny strategy, thanks for contributing! – Santropedro Jan 5 '17 at 15:08
1

Well, since the values of pieces in bughouse chess depends severely on the position type (e.g. a queen is often useless) you may want to stall/not play immediately when you're waiting for a specific piece to complete your strategy in general, not necessarily to win you a piece or gain some specific advantage.

E.g. you may have noticed experienced bughouse players starting with 1.Nf3 followed by Ng5 or Ne5 and sacrificing at f7. Now, when the king takes the knight, you might not reach an immediate advantage, but getting a knight could yield you a nice aggressive position. Or another example would be waiting to get a pawn very early to disturb your opponents development as early as 2nd or 3rd move, with the goal of attacking, but also getting more space and a psychological advantage. While we're on that, sometimes if you're playing blitz bughouse casually, chatting etc. you might want to spend some time just to get your opponent off track, since psychology plays a huge role in chess, and therefore in bughouse as well.

However, I would agree with you that on most occasions it is that you see you're getting checkmated in the next move so you let your partner play as long as he can(given that you have more time than your diagonal opponent, of course).

That's pretty much all I can think of, I hope you find this answer useful!

| improve this answer | |
  • i don't understand in the 2nd paragraph who migh not reach inmediate advantage, who of the 4 players? – Santropedro Jan 21 '17 at 17:42
  • You mean when the kingt is sacrificed? In that instance I believe the player who sacrificed the knight has the advantage, because you've exposed your opponent's king very early, deprived them of a fast 0-0 move and get the initiative, not definitive though, since bughouse isn't exactly well defined. – MakeTheTrumpetsBlow Jan 23 '17 at 17:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.