3

Chesstempo database gives white over 65% in all the variations after 6. dxc5 (130 games with both players 2200+). It has been used by Anand and Ivanchuk. So why the main line 6. g3 is way (2800+ games with both players 2200+) more popular where black scores much better?

It has to be because of black's preparation. But what should be the correct response? I don't see one using the database. Nor can I find one using chess engine.

[Event "?"]
[FEN ""]

1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c5 4. cxd5 exd5 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. dxc5 d4 7. Na4 Bxc5 
( 7... b5 8. cxb6 axb6 9. e3  )
( 7... Bf5 8. e3 d3 9. Qb3 )
8. Nxc5 Qa5+ 9. Bd2 Qxc5 10. Rc1
3

6. dxc5 is just a good move, and you cannot really hope to refute it. It was given an exclamation mark in Grandmaster Reportoire 10 by Ntirlis and Aagard, and their main line starts as in your diagram.

Moves such as dxc5 were underestimated by older theory because they were thought to give the initiative to black. Nowadays with computers we can analyse more concretely and see if blacks initiative is something to be afraid of or not. In the case of 6. dxc5, the analysis seems to suggest that white ends up with a small advantage.

| improve this answer | |
  • I'll add that 5...Nf6 avoids this variation and Black should play it. Then White has to go into the traditional main lines. – M.M Oct 27 '16 at 5:52
  • how can 5... Nf6 stop 6. dxc5? Now you are down a pawn, d5 is under threat and can't play 6... d4 – jf328 Oct 27 '16 at 9:41
1

First, I think your statistics are misleading. 130 games is not a very large sample set, and you didn't give the minimum rating for the players. Are these master games, grandmaster games, or games by players of all ratings? The winning percentage of white might be meaningful if all the games were played by super-grandmasters, but I don't think that's the case.

I think that the 6. dxc5 line is more forcing than other lines. This means that a well-prepared black player might have an easier time accomplishing a draw. The 6. g3 variation is slower, and allows for a more playable game where world-class players like Magnus Carlsen have more room to outplay an opponent.

Let's look at it from a logical point of view, too. White's goal is to isolate black's d5 pawn and attack it. White doesn't have to do this right away. Allowing black to play d4 changes the character of the game. Why not keep things as they are, slowly develop your bishop to a great square on g2, and isolate the pawn when you feel ready? This way, hopefully, we don't allow d4.

In the position you give, 10... Qb6 is the best response according to the chess24 engine. If you play through the line, you see that the pieces get traded off and it is pretty forcing.

| improve this answer | |
  • Hi, I edited the OP, it was 2200+ from both players – jf328 Oct 24 '16 at 8:21
  • Hm, even that might be misleading. Grandmaster games would probably offer more insight into an opening. The fact that the world's top avoid a line says a lot, too. – ktm5124 Oct 24 '16 at 18:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.