4

I gave someone 3 months to become as good a chess player as I am. She was just a beginner and I'm a slightly below average player (around 1500 elo).

To see if she managed to do this, I figured we should play a chess match consisting of multiple games.

But what is a reasonable or standard amount of games to play in a chess match (or a 2 player tournament, if you will)?

  • Seriously, 3 months from beginner to 1500? If you do 8 hours a day, 3month gives less than 1000 hours. I have spent more than that on chess tactics puzzles alone and I struggle at 1800. – jf328 Oct 12 '16 at 14:57
  • Ha, she likes a challenge. I don't think she succeeded though. – wvdz Oct 12 '16 at 15:11
4

The amount of games in a match is usually* even, to guarantee an equal balance between White and Black. 2 game (mini)-matches are rare, except in knock-out tournaments like the Chess World Cup. More games will produce a more reliable result, so you should play as many games as you have time for, but 4 games should already give a good indication about who's the better player. With some mathematics and the expected performance formula you can calculate the odds of losing an X-game match to a player who is Y ELO points better/worse than you.

*: The only exception is an Armageddon game which can be used after a match which ended in a draw (i.e. the same score for both players).

| improve this answer | |
3

Play 6 games at G15 or G30. record all the games so you can review them afterwards. That will give you just enough games to gage her play.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.