I recently met a club player who had been playing chess for 23 years, but couldn't improve his ELO more that 1800. When I played with him, I found his tactical skills are good, moderate endgame knowledge (excels in rook endgames) and poor opening knowledge. Afterwards we had a chat and I could uncover several myths in his mind such as knights are superior to bishops, two rooks will never beat a queen etc. If I am tutoring a student like him, how would I go about teaching him. My first impression is to make him unlearn the 'myths' in his mind, teach a few opening lines helping him to understand basic principles like developing pieces quickly, controlling the center etc.

2 Answers 2


Teach him by showing example positions that you can play out against each other. There is a big difference between being told that two rooks are often stronger than a queen and really experiencing the power of the two rooks. You could maybe play out a position from the Kramnik-Leko match 2004.

  • I will try that out. By the way, it seems impractical to start from a beginner level teaching him the opening principles. He would counter my arguments by showcasing his victories by not following the book in the opening phase.
    – Sathyam
    Sep 2, 2015 at 3:34

You can try and show him the games played by legendary players like Bobby Fischer, Paul Murphy, Emmanuel Lasker, Jose Capablanca, Alexander Alekhine, Garry Kasparov, Anatoly Karpov etc. Moreover, for any chess player , reading the following book is a must. It is the BIBLE of Chess. The book is named MY 60 MEMORABLE GAMES by Bobby Fischer. Watching these games and reading the annotations not only increases the chess knowledge but is also great fun. For such a senior player I think this is a good way to teach him.

  • 4
    The book by Fisher is no doubt a classic one, but it takes more to call it as a bible of chess.
    – Sathyam
    Sep 2, 2015 at 12:25
  • Bible in the sense that a survey conducted 2 years ago about the books preffered by present GMs, IMs and all living world champions showed this book to be a hot favourite of all of them and the only common link among them. That means, the game has progressed a lot with new variations and new insights in several openings but the knowledge offered by this book has and perhaps will never go irrelevant. Sep 2, 2015 at 12:32
  • 1
    Thank you for the clarification. Could you be more precise about the survey? May be a link to the published results.
    – Sathyam
    Sep 2, 2015 at 14:51
  • Check tis out on chess.com/article/view/the-best-chess-books-ever Sep 3, 2015 at 13:59
  • The article is not a survey but rather an opinion from one of numerous IM's.
    – Sathyam
    Sep 4, 2015 at 2:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.